On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 16:54 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > The driver emits a warning when -fstack-check and > -fstack-clash-protection are used together, but the message refers to > "-fstack-clash_protection" (underline instead of dash).
Forgot: Ok for trunk? Though I think it's obvious but let's follow the procedure :). > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * toplev.cc (process_options): Fix the spelling of > "-fstack-clash-protection". > --- > gcc/toplev.cc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/toplev.cc b/gcc/toplev.cc > index 4c15d4f542e..109c9d58cbd 100644 > --- a/gcc/toplev.cc > +++ b/gcc/toplev.cc > @@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ process_options (bool no_backend) > if (flag_stack_check != NO_STACK_CHECK && > flag_stack_clash_protection) > { > warning_at (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, 0, > - "%<-fstack-check=%> and %<-fstack-clash_protection%> > are " > + "%<-fstack-check=%> and %<-fstack-clash-protection%> > are " > "mutually exclusive; disabling %<-fstack-check=%>"); > flag_stack_check = NO_STACK_CHECK; > } -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University