On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 16:54 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> The driver emits a warning when -fstack-check and
> -fstack-clash-protection are used together, but the message refers to
> "-fstack-clash_protection" (underline instead of dash).
Forgot: Ok for trunk? Though I think it's obvious but let's follow the
procedure :).
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * toplev.cc (process_options): Fix the spelling of
> "-fstack-clash-protection".
> ---
> gcc/toplev.cc | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/toplev.cc b/gcc/toplev.cc
> index 4c15d4f542e..109c9d58cbd 100644
> --- a/gcc/toplev.cc
> +++ b/gcc/toplev.cc
> @@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ process_options (bool no_backend)
> if (flag_stack_check != NO_STACK_CHECK &&
> flag_stack_clash_protection)
> {
> warning_at (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, 0,
> - "%<-fstack-check=%> and %<-fstack-clash_protection%>
> are "
> + "%<-fstack-check=%> and %<-fstack-clash-protection%>
> are "
> "mutually exclusive; disabling %<-fstack-check=%>");
> flag_stack_check = NO_STACK_CHECK;
> }
--
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
