On 11 March 2023 18:33:46 CET, Sean Bright via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >Hi, > >This fixes a minor issue where the zero-length-bound docs read "See See >Zero Length." > >gcc/ChangeLog: > * doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Remove errant 'See' > before @xref. >--- > gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi >index 3a6a97862b0..174d160dd6c 100644 >--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi >+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi >@@ -8345,7 +8345,7 @@ conversions the warnings >@option{-Wno-int-to-pointer-cast} and > @item -Wzero-length-bounds > Warn about accesses to elements of zero-length array members that might > overlap other members of the same object. Declaring interior zero-length >-arrays is discouraged because accesses to them are undefined. See >+arrays is discouraged because accesses to them are undefined. > @xref{Zero Length}.
I'm not a native speaker, but wouldn't it be better to talk about singular access, i.e. s/accesses/access/ in both cases? thanks,