On 3/4/23, Janne Blomqvist via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:31 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran > <fort...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> Mere cosmetics. >> >> - if (foo != NULL) >> free (foo); >> >> With the caveat that coccinelle ruins replacement whitespace or i'm >> uneducated enough to be unable to _not_ run the diff through >> sed -e 's/^+\([[:space:]]*\)free(/+\1free (/' >> at least. If anybody knows how to improve replacement whitespace, >> i'd be interrested but didn't look nor ask. ISTM that leading >> whitespace is somewhat ruined, too, so beware (8 spaces versus tab as >> far as i have spot-checked). >> >> Would touch >> gcc/ada/rtinit.c | 3 +-- >> intl/bindtextdom.c | 3 +-- >> intl/loadmsgcat.c | 6 ++---- >> intl/localcharset.c | 3 +-- >> libbacktrace/xztest.c | 9 +++------ >> libbacktrace/zstdtest.c | 9 +++------ >> libbacktrace/ztest.c | 9 +++------ >> libgfortran/caf/single.c | 6 ++---- >> libgfortran/io/async.c | 6 ++---- >> libgfortran/io/format.c | 3 +-- >> libgfortran/io/transfer.c | 6 ++---- >> libgfortran/io/unix.c | 3 +-- >> libgo/runtime/go-setenv.c | 6 ++---- >> libgo/runtime/go-unsetenv.c | 3 +-- >> libgomp/target.c | 3 +-- >> libiberty/concat.c | 3 +-- >> zlib/contrib/minizip/unzip.c | 2 +- >> zlib/contrib/minizip/zip.c | 2 +- >> zlib/examples/enough.c | 6 ++---- >> zlib/examples/gun.c | 2 +- >> zlib/examples/gzjoin.c | 3 +-- >> zlib/examples/gzlog.c | 6 ++---- >> >> coccinelle script and invocation inline. >> Would need to be split for the respective maintainers and run through >> mklog with subject changelog and should of course be compiled and >> tested before that. >> >> Remarks: >> 1) We should do this in if-conversion (?) on our own. >> I suppose. Independently of -fdelete-null-pointer-checks >> 2) Maybe not silently, but raise language awareness nowadays. >> By now it's been a long time since this was first mandated. >> 3) fallout from looking at something completely different >> 4) i most likely will not remember to split it apart and send proper >> patches, tested patches, in stage 1 to maintainers proper, so if >> anyone feels like pursuing this, be my guest. I thought i'd just >> mention it. >> >> cheers, > > Back in 2011 Jim Meyering applied a patch doing this, see > https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00403.html , and > the gcc/README.Portability snippet added then which is still there. > > Per analysis done then, it seems SunOS 4 was the last system where > free() of a NULL pointer didn't behave per the spec. > > Also in Jim's patch intl/ and zlib/ directories were not touched as > those are imported from other upstreams. >
Speaking of which, this reminded me that I opened bug 80528 to catch code like this as a compiler warning: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80528 > -- > Janne Blomqvist >
