Hello, Gerald, On Feb 11, 2023, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Introduce -nostdlib++ option >> >> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C, >> is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc++ >> without also dropping libc and any other libraries that the target >> implicitly links in. > % grep -r nostdlib $WWWDOCS > % > Should this be documented in gcc-13/changes.html? Would you mind proposing > a snippet (or going ahead and pushing it)? I can't make my mind up about this. At first, the goal of adding the option was just to aid this specific test. But then, it transpired that other compilers offered a similar option, with the spelling that we ended up using, so perhaps it would make sense to document it, after all. How about this, does this seem useful? diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html index ff70d2eefecec..c1bbbfa28e18e 100644 --- a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html +++ b/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html @@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ a work-in-progress.</p> <li>The <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wpessimizing-move";><code>-Wpessimizing-move</code></a> and <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wredundant-move";><code>-Wredundant-move</code></a> warnings have been extended to warn in more contexts.</li> + <li>The <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Link_Options.html#index-nostdlib_002b_002b";><code>-nostdlib++</code></a> + option has been added, to enable linking with <code>g++</code> + without implicitly linking in the C++ standard library.</li> </ul> <h4 id="libstdcxx">Runtime Library (libstdc++)</h4> -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
