And which -march -mabi you used will got issue?

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 8:51 AM Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:47:31 PDT (-0700), Kito Cheng wrote:
> > Do you mind shared gcc configure and the option you tried?
>
> Just riscv-gnu-toolchain with "--enbale-multilib --enable-linux".
>
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 4:01 AM Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 08:44:24 PDT (-0700), gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> >> >> Yep, if I drop the non-canonicial strings via
> >> >>
> >> >>     diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator 
> >> >> b/gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator
> >> >>     index 58b7198b243..a63a4d69c18 100755
> >> >>     --- a/gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator
> >> >>     +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator
> >> >>     @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ for cmodel in cmodels:
> >> >>          ext_combs = expand_combination(ext)
> >> >>          alts = sum([[x] + [x + y for y in ext_combs] for x in [arch] + 
> >> >> extra], [])
> >> >>          alts = filter(lambda x: len(x) != 0, alts)
> >> >>     -    alts = alts + list(map(lambda a : arch_canonicalize(a, 
> >> >> args.misa_spec), alts))
> >> >>     +    alts = list(map(lambda a : arch_canonicalize(a, 
> >> >> args.misa_spec), alts))
> >> >>
> >> >>          # Drop duplicated entry.
> >> >>          alts = unique(alts)
> >> >>
> >> >> then I can't link `-march=rv32imafdcv`, I need
> >> >> `-march=rv32imacv_zicsr_zve32f_zve32x_zve64x_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b`.  
> >> >> That's
> >> >> kind of a headache for users to type in.
> >> >
> >> > Yes, that's a headache for users, but arch string canonicalization is
> >> > hiddened at the process,
> >> > so the user could still just use rv32imafdcv at compile time and
> >> > multi-lib config.
> >> >
> >> > And the driver and multilib-generator (with arch_canonicalize) script
> >> > will handle those headache in the background.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say.  I just rebuilt
> >> GCC with this patch (and t-linux-multilib regenerated from it), it's not
> >> resolving multlibs for the short names.

Reply via email to