On Saturday, April 22, 2023, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 11:30:24AM +0800, haochen.jiang via Gcc-patches wrote: >> On Linux/x86_64, >> >> 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e is the first bad commit >> commit 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e >> Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> >> Date: Tue Apr 18 21:32:07 2023 -0400 >> >> c++: fix 'unsigned typedef-name' extension [PR108099] >> >> caused >> >> FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test > > That is mentioned in > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-April/616439.html > as known problem. I think the test should use std::make_signed<rep_t> > instead of signed rep_t
It's already testing non-public implementation details, it could just use #if and use signed __int128 or signed long long as appropriate. > which it uses, but as Jason mentioned, > it reveals further problems that need to be looked at. > > Jakub > >
