Thanks.
On Wed, May 3, 2023, 11:17 Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
> Pushed to master as obvious.
>
> Martin
>
> PR tree-optimization/109693
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * value-range-storage.cc (vrange_allocator::vrange_allocator):
> Remove unused field.
> * value-range-storage.h: Likewise.
> ---
> gcc/value-range-storage.cc | 1 -
> gcc/value-range-storage.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/value-range-storage.cc b/gcc/value-range-storage.cc
> index 7d2de5e8384..14bec500dbc 100644
> --- a/gcc/value-range-storage.cc
> +++ b/gcc/value-range-storage.cc
> @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ public:
> };
>
> vrange_allocator::vrange_allocator (bool gc)
> - : m_gc (gc)
> {
> if (gc)
> m_alloc = new vrange_ggc_alloc;
> diff --git a/gcc/value-range-storage.h b/gcc/value-range-storage.h
> index 4ec0da73059..a90b64b2bf0 100644
> --- a/gcc/value-range-storage.h
> +++ b/gcc/value-range-storage.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ public:
> private:
> DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN (vrange_allocator);
> class vrange_internal_alloc *m_alloc;
> - bool m_gc;
> };
>
> // Efficient memory storage for a vrange.
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
