On 14.05.23 14:27, Mikael Morin wrote:
(...)
@@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ ref_same_as_full_array (gfc_ref *full_ref,
gfc_ref *ref)
there is some kind of overlap.
0 : array references are identical or not overlapping. */
-int
+bool
gfc_dep_resolver (gfc_ref *lref, gfc_ref *rref, gfc_reverse *reverse,
bool identical)
{
The function comment states that the function may return 2, which
doesn't seem to be the case any more.
Hm, this makes me a litte suspicious. Was functionality for reversing
loops lost, maybe unintentionally? I assume that, at some time, we did
use the '2' as return value (or did we?)
Best regards
Thomas
