"Maciej W. Rozycki" <ma...@orcam.me.uk> writes: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> > There are extra ICEs in regression testing and code quality is poor; cf. >> > <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588296.html>. >> >> Do you have something you can show for this? Maybe in a PR? > > I have filed no PRs as I didn't assess the collateral damage at the time > I looked at it. I only ran regression-testing with `-mlra' shortly after > I completed MODE_CC conversion and added the option, to see what lies > beyond. And I only added `-mlra' and made minimal changes to make the > compiler build again just to make it easier to proceed towards LRA.
I think before moving forward with the plan in general, a PR is ideally needed for each target anyway. Not all machine maintainers actively watch the MLs.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
