Hello all, and sorry for getting into this a bit late. I have a
question concerning this patch:
> +++ cp/call.c (working copy)
[...]
> +static const char *
> +op_error_string (const char *err_msg, int ntypes, bool match)
> +{
> + const char *msg;
> +
> + const char *msgt = concat (match ? G_("ambiguous overload for ")
> + : G_("no match for "), err_msg, NULL);
> +
> + if (ntypes == 3)
> + msg = concat (msgt, G_(" (operand types are %qT, %qT, and %qT)"), NULL);
> + else if (ntypes == 2)
> + msg = concat (msgt, G_(" (operand types are %qT and %qT)"), NULL);
> + else
> + msg = concat (msgt, G_(" (operand type is %qT)"), NULL);
> +
> + return msg;
> +}
> +
I am wondering if the last uses of concat here (without freeing the
previous msgt) lead to a memory leak or not ...
Sorry for the noise if I just misunderstood things here.
Thanks.
--
Dodji
