On 3/20/23 07:33, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my workmates found there is a warning like:
>
> libgcc/config/rs6000/morestack.S:402: Warning: ignoring
> incorrect section type for .init_array.00000
>
> when compiling libgcc/config/rs6000/morestack.S.
>
> Since commit r13-6545 touched that file recently, which was
> suspected to be responsible for this warning, I did some
> investigation and found this is a warning staying for a long
> time. For section .init_stack*, it's preferred to use
> section type SHT_INIT_ARRAY. So this patch is use
> "@init_array" to replace "@progbits".
>
> Although the warning is trivial, Segher suggested me to
> post this to fix it, in order to avoid any possible
> misunderstanding/confusion on the warning.
>
> As Alan confirmed, this doesn't require a premise check
> on if the existing binutils supports "@init_array" or not,
> "because if you want split-stack to work, you must link
> with gold, any version of binutils that has gold has an
> assembler that understands @init_array". (Thanks Alan!)
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux
> and powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu.
>
> Is it ok for trunk when next stage 1 comes?
>
> BR,
> Kewen
> -----
> libgcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/i386/morestack.S: Use @init_array rather than
> @progbits for section type of section .init_array.
> * config/rs6000/morestack.S: Likewise.
> * config/s390/morestack.S: Likewise.
s390 parts are ok. I did run a bootstrap and regression. Looks all good. Thanks!
Andreas
