On May 25, 2023, "Kewen.Lin" <li...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Thanks for fixing, I tested this on ppc64le and ppc64 {-m64,-m32}
> well.
Thanks!
> I think this is for PR101169, could you add it as PR marker?
Nice, will do!
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 3 { target ilp32 }
>> } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 2 { target ilp32 }
>> } } */
> So both lp64 and ilp32 have the same count, could we merge it and
> remove the selectors?
We could, but... I thought I wouldn't, since they were different
before, and they're likely to diverge again in the future. I thought
that combining them might suggest that they ought to be the same, when
we already know that this is not the case.
I'll prepare an alternate patch that combines them.
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
