From: yulong <shiyul...@iscas.ac.cn>
I find fail of the xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c test case and provide the way
to solve it.
In this patch, I modify the check information of the
function(ConEmv_imm_imm_reg and ConNmv_imm_imm_reg) body.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c:Modify
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c
index 99956f8496c..dda0f902c32 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int ConEmv_imm_imm_reg(int x, int y){
/*
**ConEmv_imm_reg_reg:
-** addi a0,a0,-1000
+** addi a5,a0,-1000
** th.mveqz a2,a1,a5
** mv a0,a2
** ret
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int ConNmv_imm_imm_reg(int x, int y){
/*
**ConNmv_imm_reg_reg:
-** addi a5,a0,-1000
+** addi a0,a0,-1000
** th.mvnez a2,a1,a0
** mv a0,a2
** ret
--
2.25.1
