Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> writes: > "juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> writes: >> Hi, Richard. Thanks for the comments. >> >>>> If we use SELECT_VL to refer only to the target-independent ifn, I don't >>>> see why this last bit is true. >> Could you give me more details and information about this since I am not >> sure whether I catch up with you. >> You mean the current SELECT_VL is not an appropriate IFN? > > No, I meant that the comment I quoted seemed to be saying that solution > 3 wasn't possible. The comment seemed to say that we would need to do > solution 1.
Sorry, I meant solution 2 rather than solution 3.
