Oh OK, thanks for the clarification. Costas
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 13:59, Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 6/7/23 04:21, Costas Argyris via Gcc-patches wrote: > > I saw this while working on something else: > > > > pex_unix_cleanup signature doesn't always match the > > body of the function in terms of ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED. > > If the conditional code in the body is compiled, then > > ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED isn't correct. > > > > This change makes it always match, thereby making it > > a bit cleaner IMO. > ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED is meant to be a "maybe unused" decoration. I'd just > leave it as-is. > > jeff >
