On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 09:30 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
>
> 在 2023/5/29 下午2:09, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> > On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 21:06 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> > > Hi, ruoyao:
> > >
> > > Thank you so much for making this submission. But we are testing
> > > the
> > > impact of these two alignment parameters
> > >
> > > (also including -falign-jumps and -falign-lables ) on performance.
> > > So
> > > before the result comes out, this patch will
> > >
> > > not be merged into the main branch for the time being.
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is there an estimate when the benchmark will be done? If it will be
> > done soon I'll wait for the result before performing a full system
> > rebuild, otherwise I'll use my gut feeling to specify a -falign-
> > functions= value for the build :).
> >
> Sorry for taking so long to reply to the email. From our current test
> results,
>
> the performance of the SPEC is best when combined with -falign-
> loops=16,
>
> -falign-jumps=16, -falign-functions=32 and -falign-lables=16.
I've completed a system rebuild with -falign-
{jumps,functions,labels}=16. I've missed -falign-loops=16 but the doc
says -falign-labels=16 implies -falign-jumps=16 and -falign-loops=16 (if
-falign-jumps or -falign-loops are not set explicitly with a larger
value).
I'll make a patch to set -falign-functions=32 and -falign-labels=16 with
-mtune={la464,loongarch64} after setting a basic develop environment on
the new system... And I'm wondering if things will change with LA664
:).
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
