Thanks for the test. Did you mean for me to incorporate it into the patch, or do you mean to contribute it separately, if the feature happens to be accepted?
On Jun 19, 2023, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't see explicit tests with _Complex nor __complex__. Would we > want to check these here, or are they handled thought the "underlying" > tests above? Good question. The notion of using complex types to hold booleans hadn't even crossed my mind. On the one hand, there doesn't seem to be reason to rule them out, and that could go for literally any other type. On the other, there doesn't seem to be any useful case for them. Can anyone think of one? > I'd welcome a fortran interop note in the docs Is there any good place for such interop notes? I'm not sure I'm best-suited to write them up, since Fortran is not a language I'm very familiar with, but I suppose I could give it a try. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
