Currently the operations allowed for if conversion of a basic block with
multiple sets are few, namely REG, SUBREG and CONST_INT (as controlled by
bb_ok_for_noce_convert_multiple_sets).

This commit allows more operations (arithmetic, compare, etc) to participate
in if conversion. The target's profitability hook and ifcvt's costing is
expected to reject sequences that are unprofitable.

This is especially useful for targets which provide a rich selection of
conditional instructions (like aarch64 which has cinc, csneg, csinv, ccmp, ...)
which are currently not used in basic blocks with more than a single set.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * ifcvt.cc (try_emit_cmove_seq): Modify comments.
        (noce_convert_multiple_sets_1): Modify comments.
        (bb_ok_for_noce_convert_multiple_sets): Allow more operations.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c: New test.

Signed-off-by: Manolis Tsamis <manolis.tsa...@vrull.eu>
---

 gcc/ifcvt.cc                                  | 60 +++++++++++------
 .../aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c      | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c

diff --git a/gcc/ifcvt.cc b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
index fd1ce8a1049..a9e5352a0a0 100644
--- a/gcc/ifcvt.cc
+++ b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
@@ -3213,13 +3213,13 @@ try_emit_cmove_seq (struct noce_if_info *if_info, rtx 
temp,
 /* We have something like:
 
      if (x > y)
-       { i = a; j = b; k = c; }
+       { i = EXPR_A; j = EXPR_B; k = EXPR_C; }
 
    Make it:
 
-     tmp_i = (x > y) ? a : i;
-     tmp_j = (x > y) ? b : j;
-     tmp_k = (x > y) ? c : k;
+     tmp_i = (x > y) ? EXPR_A : i;
+     tmp_j = (x > y) ? EXPR_B : j;
+     tmp_k = (x > y) ? EXPR_C : k;
      i = tmp_i;
      j = tmp_j;
      k = tmp_k;
@@ -3635,11 +3635,10 @@ noce_convert_multiple_sets_1 (struct noce_if_info 
*if_info,
 
 
 
-/* Return true iff basic block TEST_BB is comprised of only
-   (SET (REG) (REG)) insns suitable for conversion to a series
-   of conditional moves.  Also check that we have more than one set
-   (other routines can handle a single set better than we would), and
-   fewer than PARAM_MAX_RTL_IF_CONVERSION_INSNS sets.  While going
+/* Return true iff basic block TEST_BB is suitable for conversion to a
+   series of conditional moves.  Also check that we have more than one
+   set (other routines can handle a single set better than we would),
+   and fewer than PARAM_MAX_RTL_IF_CONVERSION_INSNS sets.  While going
    through the insns store the sum of their potential costs in COST.  */
 
 static bool
@@ -3665,20 +3664,43 @@ bb_ok_for_noce_convert_multiple_sets (basic_block 
test_bb, unsigned *cost)
       rtx dest = SET_DEST (set);
       rtx src = SET_SRC (set);
 
-      /* We can possibly relax this, but for now only handle REG to REG
-        (including subreg) moves.  This avoids any issues that might come
-        from introducing loads/stores that might violate data-race-freedom
-        guarantees.  */
-      if (!REG_P (dest))
+      /* Do not handle anything involving memory loads/stores since it might
+        violate data-race-freedom guarantees.  */
+      if (!REG_P (dest) || contains_mem_rtx_p (src))
        return false;
 
-      if (!((REG_P (src) || CONSTANT_P (src))
-           || (GET_CODE (src) == SUBREG && REG_P (SUBREG_REG (src))
-             && subreg_lowpart_p (src))))
+      /* Allow a wide range of operations and let the costing function decide
+        if the conversion is worth it later.  */
+      enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (src);
+      if (!(CONSTANT_P (src)
+           || code == REG
+           || code == SUBREG
+           || code == ZERO_EXTEND
+           || code == SIGN_EXTEND
+           || code == NOT
+           || code == NEG
+           || code == PLUS
+           || code == MINUS
+           || code == AND
+           || code == IOR
+           || code == MULT
+           || code == ASHIFT
+           || code == ASHIFTRT
+           || code == NE
+           || code == EQ
+           || code == GE
+           || code == GT
+           || code == LE
+           || code == LT
+           || code == GEU
+           || code == GTU
+           || code == LEU
+           || code == LTU
+           || code == COMPARE))
        return false;
 
-      /* Destination must be appropriate for a conditional write.  */
-      if (!noce_operand_ok (dest))
+      /* Destination and source must be appropriate.  */
+      if (!noce_operand_ok (dest) || !noce_operand_ok (src))
        return false;
 
       /* We must be able to conditionally move in this mode.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f29cc72263a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-ce1" } */
+
+void sink2(int, int);
+void sink3(int, int, int);
+
+void cond_1(int cond, int x, int y) {
+    if (cond) {
+        x = x << 4;
+        y = 1;
+    }
+
+    sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+void cond_2(int cond, int x, int y) {
+    if (cond) {
+        x++;
+        y++;
+    }
+
+    sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+void cond_3(int cond, int x1, int x2, int x3) {
+    if (cond) {
+        x1++;
+        x2++;
+        x3++;
+    }
+
+    sink3(x1, x2, x3);
+}
+
+void cond_4(int cond, int x, int y) {
+    if (cond) {
+        x += 2;
+        y += 3;
+    }
+
+    sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+void cond_5(int cond, int x, int y, int r1, int r2) {
+    if (cond) {
+        x = r1 + 2;
+        y = r2 - 34;
+    }
+
+    sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+void cond_6(int cond, int x, int y) {
+    if (cond) {
+        x = -x;
+        y = ~y;
+    }
+
+    sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cinc\t" 5 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "csneg\t" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "csinv\t" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "csel\t" 1 } } */
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "if-conversion succeeded through 
noce_convert_multiple_sets" 6 "ce1" } } */
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
2.34.1

Reply via email to