On 6/29/23 4:31 AM, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This is okay for trunk (no backports needed btw), this fix can even be
> taken as obvious, thanks!
> 
>>
>> 2023-06-07  Jeevitha Palanisamy  <jeevi...@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> gcc/
>>      PR target/106907
> 
> One curious question is that this PR106907 seemed not to report this issue,
> is there another PR reporting this?  Or do I miss something?

I think Jeevitha just ran cppcheck by hand and noticed the "new" warnings
and added them to the list of things to fixup.  Yeah, it would be nice to
add the new warnings to the PR for historical reasons.

Peter



Reply via email to