On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 9:37 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> The PRs ask for optimizing of
>
>   _1 = BIT_FIELD_REF <b_3(D), 64, 64>;
>   result_4 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <a_2(D), _1, 64>;
>
> to a vector permutation.  The following implements this as
> match.pd pattern, improving code generation on x86_64.
>
> On the RTL level we face the issue that backend patterns inconsistently
> use vec_merge and vec_select of vec_concat to represent permutes.
>
> I think using a (supported) permute is almost always better
> than an extract plus insert, maybe excluding the case we extract
> element zero and that's aliased to a register that can be used
> directly for insertion (not sure how to query that).
>
> But this regresses for example gcc.target/i386/pr54855-8.c because PRE
> now realizes that
>
>   _1 = BIT_FIELD_REF <x_3(D), 64, 0>;
>   if (_1 > a_4(D))
>     goto <bb 3>; [50.00%]
>   else
>     goto <bb 4>; [50.00%]
>
>   <bb 3> [local count: 536870913]:
>
>   <bb 4> [local count: 1073741824]:
>   # iftmp.0_2 = PHI <_1(3), a_4(D)(2)>
>   x_5 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <x_3(D), iftmp.0_2, 0>;
>
> is equal to
>
>   <bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
>   _1 = BIT_FIELD_REF <x_3(D), 64, 0>;
>   if (_1 > a_4(D))
>     goto <bb 4>; [50.00%]
>   else
>     goto <bb 3>; [50.00%]
>
>   <bb 3> [local count: 536870912]:
>   _7 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <x_3(D), a_4(D), 0>;
>
>   <bb 4> [local count: 1073741824]:
>   # prephitmp_8 = PHI <x_3(D)(2), _7(3)>
>
> and that no longer produces the desired maxsd operation at the RTL
The comparison is scalar mode, but operations in then_bb is
vector_mode, if_convert can't eliminate the condition any more(and
won't go into backend ix86_expand_sse_fp_minmax).
I think for ordered comparisons like _1 > a_4, it doesn't match
fmin/fmax, but match SSE MINSS/MAXSS since it alway returns the second
operand(not the other operand) when there's NONE.
> level (we fail to match .FMAX at the GIMPLE level earlier).
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with regressions:
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-13.c scan-assembler-times vmaxsh[ \\\\t] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-13.c scan-assembler-not vcomish[ \\\\t]
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-8.c scan-assembler-times maxsd 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-8.c scan-assembler-not movsd
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-9.c scan-assembler-times minss 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54855-9.c scan-assembler-not movss
>
> I think this is also PR88540 (the lack of min/max detection, not
> sure if the SSE min/max are suitable here)
>
>         PR tree-optimization/94864
>         PR tree-optimization/94865
>         * match.pd (bit_insert @0 (BIT_FIELD_REF @1 ..) ..): New pattern
>         for vector insertion from vector extraction.
>
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr94864.c: New testcase.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr94865.c: Likewise.
> ---
>  gcc/match.pd                            | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94864.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94865.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94864.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94865.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> index 8543f777a28..8cc106049c4 100644
> --- a/gcc/match.pd
> +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> @@ -7770,6 +7770,31 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
>                       wi::to_wide (@ipos) + isize))
>      (BIT_FIELD_REF @0 @rsize @rpos)))))
>
> +/* Simplify vector inserts of other vector extracts to a permute.  */
> +(simplify
> + (bit_insert @0 (BIT_FIELD_REF@2 @1 @rsize @rpos) @ipos)
> + (if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (type)
> +      && types_match (@0, @1)
> +      && types_match (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (@0)), TREE_TYPE (@2))
> +      && TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).is_constant ())
> +  (with
> +   {
> +     unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT elsz
> +       = tree_to_uhwi (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (@1))));
> +     poly_uint64 relt = exact_div (tree_to_poly_uint64 (@rpos), elsz);
> +     poly_uint64 ielt = exact_div (tree_to_poly_uint64 (@ipos), elsz);
> +     unsigned nunits = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
> +     vec_perm_builder builder;
> +     builder.new_vector (nunits, nunits, 1);
> +     for (unsigned i = 0; i < nunits; ++i)
> +       builder.quick_push (known_eq (ielt, i) ? nunits + relt : i);
> +     vec_perm_indices sel (builder, 2, nunits);
> +   }
> +   (if (!VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (type))
> +       || can_vec_perm_const_p (TYPE_MODE (type), TYPE_MODE (type), sel, 
> false))
> +    (vec_perm @0 @1 { vec_perm_indices_to_tree
> +                        (build_vector_type (ssizetype, nunits), sel); })))))
> +
>  (if (canonicalize_math_after_vectorization_p ())
>   (for fmas (FMA)
>    (simplify
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94864.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94864.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..69cb481fcfe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94864.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -msse2 -mno-avx" } */
> +
> +typedef double v2df __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
> +
> +v2df move_sd(v2df a, v2df b)
> +{
> +    v2df result = a;
> +    result[0] = b[1];
> +    return result;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "unpckhpd\[\\t \]%xmm0, %xmm1" } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94865.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94865.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..84065ac2467
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94865.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -msse2 -mno-avx" } */
> +
> +typedef double v2df __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
> +
> +v2df move_sd(v2df a, v2df b)
> +{
> +    v2df result = a;
> +    result[1] = b[1];
> +    return result;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "shufpd\[\\t \]*.2, %xmm1, %xmm0" } } */
> --
> 2.35.3



-- 
BR,
Hongtao

Reply via email to