On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:47:10PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 5/26/23 19:18, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Since r8-509, we'll no longer create a static temporary var for
> > the initializer '{ 1, 2 }' for num in the attached test because
> > the code in finish_compound_literal is now guarded by
> > '&& fcl_context == fcl_c99' but it's fcl_functional here.  This
> > causes us to reject num as non-constant when evaluating it in
> > a template.
> > 
> > Jason's idea was to treat num as value-dependent even though it
> > actually isn't.  This patch implements that suggestion.
> > 
> > The is_really_empty_class check is sort of non-obvious but the
> > comment should explain why I added it.
> > 
> > Co-authored-by: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> > 
> >     PR c++/109876
> > 
> > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >     * pt.cc (value_dependent_expression_p) <case VAR_DECL>: Treat a
> >     constexpr-declared non-constant variable as value-dependent.
> > 
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >     * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C: New test.
> >     * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C: New test.
> > ---
> >   gcc/cp/pt.cc                                  | 12 ++++++
> >   .../g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C       | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
> >   .../g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C        | 25 ++++++++++++
> >   3 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C
> >   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> > index 7fb3e75bceb..38fd8070705 100644
> > --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> > @@ -27969,6 +27969,18 @@ value_dependent_expression_p (tree expression)
> >         else if (TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (expression)))
> >     /* FIXME cp_finish_decl doesn't fold reference initializers.  */
> >     return true;
> > +      /* We have a constexpr variable and we're processing a template.  
> > When
> > +    there's lifetime extension involved (for which finish_compound_literal
> > +    used to create a temporary), we'll not be able to evaluate the
> > +    variable until instantiating, so pretend it's value-dependent.  */
> > +      else if (DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (expression)
> > +          && !TREE_CONSTANT (expression)
> > +          /* When there's nothing to initialize, we'll never mark the
> > +             VAR_DECL TREE_CONSTANT, therefore it would remain
> > +             value-dependent and we wouldn't instantiate.  */
 
Sorry it's taken so long to get back to this.

> Interesting.  Can we change that (i.e. mark it TREE_CONSTANT) rather than
> work around it here?

I think we can.  Maybe as in the below:

-- >8 --
Since r8-509, we'll no longer create a static temporary var for
the initializer '{ 1, 2 }' for num in the attached test because
the code in finish_compound_literal is now guarded by
'&& fcl_context == fcl_c99' but it's fcl_functional here.  This
causes us to reject num as non-constant when evaluating it in
a template.

Jason's idea was to treat num as value-dependent even though it
actually isn't.  This patch implements that suggestion.

We weren't marking objects whose type is an empty class type
constant.  This patch changes that so that v_d_e_p doesn't need
to check is_really_empty_class.

Co-authored-by: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

        PR c++/109876

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * decl.cc (cp_finish_decl): Set TREE_CONSTANT when initializing
        an object of empty class type.
        * pt.cc (value_dependent_expression_p) <case VAR_DECL>: Treat a
        constexpr-declared non-constant variable as value-dependent.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template2.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/decl.cc                                | 13 +++++--
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                                  |  7 ++++
 .../g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C       | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C        | 25 ++++++++++++
 .../g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template2.C        | 25 ++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template2.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 60f107d50c4..792ab330dd0 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -8200,7 +8200,6 @@ void
 cp_finish_decl (tree decl, tree init, bool init_const_expr_p,
                tree asmspec_tree, int flags)
 {
-  tree type;
   vec<tree, va_gc> *cleanups = NULL;
   const char *asmspec = NULL;
   int was_readonly = 0;
@@ -8220,7 +8219,7 @@ cp_finish_decl (tree decl, tree init, bool 
init_const_expr_p,
   /* Parameters are handled by store_parm_decls, not cp_finish_decl.  */
   gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (decl) != PARM_DECL);
 
-  type = TREE_TYPE (decl);
+  tree type = TREE_TYPE (decl);
   if (type == error_mark_node)
     return;
 
@@ -8410,7 +8409,7 @@ cp_finish_decl (tree decl, tree init, bool 
init_const_expr_p,
          if (decl_maybe_constant_var_p (decl)
              /* FIXME setting TREE_CONSTANT on refs breaks the back end.  */
              && !TYPE_REF_P (type))
-           TREE_CONSTANT (decl) = 1;
+           TREE_CONSTANT (decl) = true;
        }
       /* This is handled mostly by gimplify.cc, but we have to deal with
         not warning about int x = x; as it is a GCC extension to turn off
@@ -8421,6 +8420,14 @@ cp_finish_decl (tree decl, tree init, bool 
init_const_expr_p,
          && !warning_enabled_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl), OPT_Winit_self))
        suppress_warning (decl, OPT_Winit_self);
     }
+  else if (VAR_P (decl)
+          && COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type)
+          && !TYPE_REF_P (type)
+          && !dependent_type_p (type)
+          && is_really_empty_class (type, /*ignore_vptr*/false))
+    /* We have no initializer but there's nothing to initialize anyway.
+       Treat DECL as constant due to c++/109876.  */
+    TREE_CONSTANT (decl) = true;
 
   if (flag_openmp
       && TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index fa15b75b9c5..255d18b9539 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -27983,6 +27983,13 @@ value_dependent_expression_p (tree expression)
       else if (TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (expression)))
        /* FIXME cp_finish_decl doesn't fold reference initializers.  */
        return true;
+      /* We have a constexpr variable and we're processing a template.  When
+        there's lifetime extension involved (for which finish_compound_literal
+        used to create a temporary), we'll not be able to evaluate the
+        variable until instantiating, so pretend it's value-dependent.  */
+      else if (DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (expression)
+              && !TREE_CONSTANT (expression))
+       return true;
       return false;
 
     case DYNAMIC_CAST_EXPR:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a9e065320c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// PR c++/109876
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+using size_t = decltype(sizeof 0);
+
+namespace std {
+template <class> struct initializer_list {
+  const int *_M_array;
+  size_t _M_len;
+  constexpr size_t size() const { return _M_len; }
+};
+} // namespace std
+
+constexpr std::initializer_list<int> gnum{2};
+
+template <int> struct Array {};
+template <int> void g()
+{
+  static constexpr std::initializer_list<int> num{2};
+  static_assert(num.size(), "");
+  Array<num.size()> ctx;
+
+  constexpr Array<1> num1{};
+}
+
+template <int N>
+struct Foo
+{
+  static constexpr std::initializer_list<int> num = { 1, 2 };
+  static_assert(num.size(), "");
+  Array<num.size()> ctx;
+};
+
+void
+f (Foo<5>)
+{
+  g<0>();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..58be046fd36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// PR c++/109876
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+struct Foo {};
+template <const Foo&> struct X {};
+
+void g()
+{
+  static constexpr Foo foo;
+  X<foo> x;
+}
+
+template<int>
+void f()
+{
+  static constexpr Foo foo;
+  X<foo> x;
+}
+
+void
+h ()
+{
+  f<0>();
+  f<1>();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5a9a96ba60a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-template2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// PR c++/109876
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+struct Foo {};
+template <const Foo&> struct X {};
+
+void g()
+{
+  static constexpr Foo foo{};
+  X<foo> x;
+}
+
+template<int>
+void f()
+{
+  static constexpr Foo foo{};
+  X<foo> x;
+}
+
+void
+h ()
+{
+  f<0>();
+  f<1>();
+}

base-commit: 834f34947b20b18696487fc5d2bccab5ea720351
-- 
2.41.0

Reply via email to