On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> Hi,
> loop-ch currently does analysis using ranger for all loops to identify
> candidates and then follows by phase where headers are duplicated (which
> breaks SSA and ranger).  The second stage does more analysis (to see how
> many BBs we want to duplicate) but can't use ranger and thus misses
> information about static conditionals.
> 
> This patch pushes all analysis into the first stage. We record how many
> BBs to duplicate and the second stage just duplicats as it is told so.
> This makes it possible to also extend range query done also to basic
> blocks that are not headers.  This is easy to do, since we already do
> path specific query so we only need to extend the path by headers we
> decided to dulicate earlier.
> 
> This makes it possible to track situations where exit that is always
> false in the first iteration for tests not in the original loop header.
> Doing so lets us to update profile better and do better heuristics.  In
> particular I changed logic as follows
>   1) should_duplicate_loop_header_p counts size of duplicated region.  When we
>      know that a given conditional will be constant true or constant false 
> either
>      in the duplicated region, by range query, or in the loop body after
>      duplication (since it is loop invariant), we do not account it to code 
> size
>      costs
>   2) don't need account loop invariant compuations that will be duplicated
>      as they will become fully invariant
>      (maybe we want to have some cap for register pressure eventually?)
>   3) optimize_size logic is now different.  Originally we started duplicating
>      iff the first conditional was known to be true by ranger query, but then
>      we used same limits as for -O2.
> 
>      I now simply lower limits to 0. This means that every conditional
>      in duplicated sequence must be either loop invariant or constant when
>      duplicated and we only duplicate statements computing loop invariants
>      and those we account to 0 size anyway,
> 
> This makes code IMO more streamlined (and hopefully will let us to merge
> ibts with loop peeling logic), but makes little difference in practice.
> The problem is that in loop:
> 
> void test2();
> void test(int n)
> {
>   for (int i = 0; n && i < 10; i++)
>         test2();
> }
> 
> We produce:
>   <bb 4> [local count: 1073741824 freq: 9.090909]:
>   # i_4 = PHI <0(2), i_9(3)>
>   _1 = n_7(D) != 0;
>   _2 = i_4 <= 9;
>   _3 = _1 & _2;
>   if (_3 != 0)
>     goto <bb 3>; [89.00%]
>   else
>     goto <bb 5>; [11.00%]
> 
> and do not understand that the final conditional is a combination of a 
> conditional
> that is always true in first iteration and a conditional that is loop 
> invariant.
> 
> This is also the case of
> void test2();
> void test(int n)
> {
>   for (int i = 0; n; i++)
>     {
>       if (i > 10)
>         break;
>       test2();
>     }
> }
> Which we turn to the earlier case in ifcombine.
> 
> With disabled ifcombine things however works as exepcted.  This is something
> I plan to handle incrementally.  However extending loop-ch and peeling passes
> to understand such combined conditionals is still not good enough: at the 
> time ifcombine
> merged the two conditionals we lost profile information on how often n is 0,
> so we can't recover correct profile or know what is expected number of 
> iterations
> after the transofrm.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Honza
> 
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * tree-ssa-loop-ch.cc (edge_range_query): Take loop argument; be ready
>       for queries not in headers.
>       (static_loop_exit): Add basic blck parameter; update use of
>       edge_range_query
>       (should_duplicate_loop_header_p): Add ranger and static_exits
>       parameter.  Do not account statements that will be optimized
>       out after duplicaiton in overall size. Add ranger query to
>       find static exits.
>       (update_profile_after_ch):  Take static_exits has set instead of
>       single eliminated_edge.
>       (ch_base::copy_headers): Do all analysis in the first pass;
>       remember invariant_exits and static_exits.
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ch.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ch.cc
> index 24e7fbc805a..e0139cb432c 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ch.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ch.cc
> @@ -49,11 +49,13 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>     the range of the solved conditional in R.  */
>  
>  static void
> -edge_range_query (irange &r, edge e, gcond *cond, gimple_ranger &ranger)
> +edge_range_query (irange &r, class loop *loop, gcond *cond, gimple_ranger 
> &ranger)
>  {
> -  auto_vec<basic_block> path (2);
> -  path.safe_push (e->dest);
> -  path.safe_push (e->src);
> +  auto_vec<basic_block, 8> path;
> +  for (basic_block bb = gimple_bb (cond); bb != loop->header; bb = 
> single_pred_edge (bb)->src)
> +    path.safe_push (bb);
> +  path.safe_push (loop->header);
> +  path.safe_push (loop_preheader_edge (loop)->src);
>    path_range_query query (ranger, path);
>    if (!query.range_of_stmt (r, cond))
>      r.set_varying (boolean_type_node);
> @@ -63,17 +65,16 @@ edge_range_query (irange &r, edge e, gcond *cond, 
> gimple_ranger &ranger)
>     and NULL otherwise.  */
>  
>  static edge
> -static_loop_exit (class loop *l, gimple_ranger *ranger)
> +static_loop_exit (class loop *l, basic_block bb, gimple_ranger *ranger)
>  {
> -  edge e = loop_preheader_edge (l);
> -  gcond *last = safe_dyn_cast <gcond *> (*gsi_last_bb (e->dest));
> +  gcond *last = safe_dyn_cast <gcond *> (*gsi_last_bb (bb));
>    edge ret_e;
>  
>    if (!last)
>      return NULL;
>  
>    edge true_e, false_e;
> -  extract_true_false_edges_from_block (e->dest, &true_e, &false_e);
> +  extract_true_false_edges_from_block (bb, &true_e, &false_e);
>  
>    /* If neither edge is the exit edge, this is not a case we'd like to
>       special-case.  */
> @@ -93,7 +94,7 @@ static_loop_exit (class loop *l, gimple_ranger *ranger)
>    }
>  
>    int_range<2> r;
> -  edge_range_query (r, e, last, *ranger);
> +  edge_range_query (r, l, last, *ranger);
>    return r == desired_static_range ? ret_e : NULL;
>  }
>  
> @@ -131,8 +132,10 @@ loop_iv_derived_p (class loop *loop,
>  
>  static bool
>  should_duplicate_loop_header_p (basic_block header, class loop *loop,
> +                             gimple_ranger *ranger,
>                               int *limit,
> -                             hash_set <edge> *invariant_exits)
> +                             hash_set <edge> *invariant_exits,
> +                             hash_set <edge> *static_exits)
>  {
>    gimple_stmt_iterator bsi;
>  
> @@ -209,6 +212,9 @@ should_duplicate_loop_header_p (basic_block header, class 
> loop *loop,
>        if (is_gimple_debug (last))
>       continue;
>  
> +      if (gimple_code (last) == GIMPLE_COND)
> +     break;
> +
>        if (gimple_code (last) == GIMPLE_CALL
>         && (!gimple_inexpensive_call_p (as_a <gcall *> (last))
>             /* IFN_LOOP_DIST_ALIAS means that inner loop is distributed
> @@ -222,16 +228,6 @@ should_duplicate_loop_header_p (basic_block header, 
> class loop *loop,
>         return false;
>       }
>  
> -      *limit -= estimate_num_insns (last, &eni_size_weights);
> -      if (*limit < 0)
> -     {
> -       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> -         fprintf (dump_file,
> -                  "  Not duplicating bb %i contains too many insns.\n",
> -                  header->index);
> -       return false;
> -     }
> -
>        /* Classify the stmt based on whether its computation is based
>           on a IV or whether it is invariant in the loop.  */
>        gimple_set_uid (last, 0);
> @@ -257,9 +253,36 @@ should_duplicate_loop_header_p (basic_block header, 
> class loop *loop,
>                 inv = false;
>             }
>         gimple_set_uid (last, (iv ? 1 : 0) | (inv ? 2 : 0));
> +       /* Loop invariants will be optimized out in loop body after
> +          duplication; do not account invariant computation in code
> +          size costs.  */
> +       if (inv)
> +         continue;
> +     }
> +
> +      *limit -= estimate_num_insns (last, &eni_size_weights);
> +      if (*limit < 0)
> +     {
> +       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> +         fprintf (dump_file,
> +                  "  Not duplicating bb %i contains too many insns.\n",
> +                  header->index);
> +       return false;
>       }
>      }
>  
> +  edge static_exit = static_loop_exit (loop, header, ranger);
> +
> +  if (static_exit && static_exits)
> +    {
> +      static_exits->add (static_exit);
> +      if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> +     fprintf (dump_file,
> +              "    Will eliminate peeled conditional in bb %d.\n",
> +              static_exit->src->index);
> +      /* Still look for invariant exits; exit may be both.  */
> +    }
> +
>    /* If the condition tests a non-IV loop variant we do not want to rotate
>       the loop further.  Unless this is the original loop header.  */
>    tree lhs = gimple_cond_lhs (last);
> @@ -284,12 +307,28 @@ should_duplicate_loop_header_p (basic_block header, 
> class loop *loop,
>       }
>        return true;
>      }
> +
> +  if (static_exit)
> +    return true;
> +
> +  /* We was not able to prove that conditional will be eliminated.  */
> +  *limit -= estimate_num_insns (last, &eni_size_weights);
> +  if (*limit < 0)
> +    {
> +      if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> +     fprintf (dump_file,
> +              "  Not duplicating bb %i contains too many insns.\n",
> +              header->index);
> +      return false;
> +    }
> +
>    /* TODO: This is heuristics that claims that IV based ocnditionals will
>       likely be optimized out in duplicated header.  We could use ranger
>       query instead to tell this more precisely.  */
> -  if (header != loop->header
> -      && ((!lhs_invariant && !loop_iv_derived_p (loop, lhs))
> -       || (!rhs_invariant && !loop_iv_derived_p (loop, rhs))))
> +  if ((lhs_invariant || loop_iv_derived_p (loop, lhs))
> +      && (rhs_invariant || loop_iv_derived_p (loop, rhs)))
> +    return true;
> +  if (header != loop->header)
>      {
>        if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>       fprintf (dump_file,
> @@ -386,8 +425,9 @@ do_while_loop_p (class loop *loop)
>  static void
>  update_profile_after_ch (class loop *loop,
>                        basic_block *region, basic_block *region_copy,
> -                      unsigned n_region, edge eliminated_edge,
> +                      unsigned n_region,
>                        hash_set <edge> *invariant_exits,
> +                      hash_set <edge> *static_exits,
>                        profile_count entry_count)
>  {
>    for (unsigned int i = 0; i < n_region; i++)
> @@ -421,10 +461,13 @@ update_profile_after_ch (class loop *loop,
>                     && e_copy->dest == region_copy[i + 1]));
>        region_copy[i]->count = entry_count;
>        profile_count exit_e_count = exit_e->count ();
> -      if (eliminated_edge == exit_e)
> +      bool was_static = false;
> +      if (static_exits->contains (exit_e))
>       {
>         /* Update profile and the conditional.
>            CFG update is done by caller.  */
> +       static_exits->remove (exit_e);
> +       was_static = true;
>         e_copy->probability = profile_probability::always ();
>         exit_e_copy->probability = profile_probability::never ();
>         gcond *cond_stmt
> @@ -437,7 +480,6 @@ update_profile_after_ch (class loop *loop,
>         /* Header copying is a special case of jump threading, so use
>            common code to update loop body exit condition.  */
>         update_bb_profile_for_threading (region[i], entry_count, e);
> -       eliminated_edge = NULL;
>       }
>        else
>       region[i]->count -= region_copy[i]->count;
> @@ -448,7 +490,7 @@ update_profile_after_ch (class loop *loop,
>            loop, so increase probability accordingly.
>            If the edge is eliminated_edge we already corrected
>            profile above.  */
> -       if (entry_count.nonzero_p () && eliminated_edge != exit_e)
> +       if (entry_count.nonzero_p () && !was_static)
>           set_edge_probability_and_rescale_others
>                   (exit_e_copy, exit_e_count.probability_in
>                                                       (entry_count));
> @@ -465,7 +507,7 @@ update_profile_after_ch (class loop *loop,
>        entry_count = e_copy->count ();
>      }
>    /* Be sure that we seen all edges we are supposed to update.  */
> -  gcc_checking_assert (!eliminated_edge
> +  gcc_checking_assert (static_exits->is_empty ()
>                      && invariant_exits->is_empty ());
>  }
>  
> @@ -564,10 +606,7 @@ protected:
>  unsigned int
>  ch_base::copy_headers (function *fun)
>  {
> -  basic_block header;
> -  edge exit, nonexit, entry;
>    basic_block *bbs, *copied_bbs;
> -  unsigned n_bbs;
>    unsigned bbs_size;
>    bool changed = false;
>  
> @@ -578,7 +617,12 @@ ch_base::copy_headers (function *fun)
>    copied_bbs = XNEWVEC (basic_block, n_basic_blocks_for_fn (fun));
>    bbs_size = n_basic_blocks_for_fn (fun);
>  
> -  struct candidate {class loop *loop; edge static_exit;};
> +  struct candidate
> +    {
> +      class loop *loop;
> +      unsigned int nheaders;
> +      hash_set <edge> *invariant_exits, *static_exits;
> +    };
>    auto_vec<struct candidate> candidates;
>    auto_vec<std::pair<edge, loop_p> > copied;
>    auto_vec<class loop *> loops_to_unloop;
> @@ -588,13 +632,14 @@ ch_base::copy_headers (function *fun)
>    gimple_ranger *ranger = new gimple_ranger;
>    for (auto loop : loops_list (cfun, 0))
>      {
> -      int initial_limit = param_max_loop_header_insns;
> +      int initial_limit = optimize_loop_for_speed_p (loop)
> +                       ? param_max_loop_header_insns : 0;
>        int remaining_limit = initial_limit;
>        if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>       fprintf (dump_file,
>                "Analyzing loop %i\n", loop->num);
>  
> -      header = loop->header;
> +      basic_block header = loop->header;
>        if (!get_max_loop_iterations_int (loop))
>       {
>         if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> @@ -613,24 +658,38 @@ ch_base::copy_headers (function *fun)
>         || !process_loop_p (loop))
>       continue;
>  
> -      edge static_exit = static_loop_exit (loop, ranger);
> -
> -      /* Avoid loop header copying when optimizing for size unless we can
> -      determine that the loop condition is static in the first
> -      iteration.  */
> -      if (optimize_loop_for_size_p (loop)
> -       && !loop->force_vectorize
> -       && !static_exit)
> +      /* Iterate the header copying up to limit; this takes care of the cases
> +      like while (a && b) {...}, where we want to have both of the conditions
> +      copied.  TODO -- handle while (a || b) - like cases, by not requiring
> +      the header to have just a single successor and copying up to
> +      postdominator.  */
> +      int nheaders = 0;
> +      hash_set <edge> *invariant_exits = new hash_set <edge>;
> +      hash_set <edge> *static_exits = new hash_set <edge>;
> +      while (should_duplicate_loop_header_p (header, loop, ranger,
> +                                          &remaining_limit,
> +                                          invariant_exits,
> +                                          static_exits))
>       {
> +       nheaders++;
>         if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> -         fprintf (dump_file,
> -                  "  Not duplicating bb %i: optimizing for size.\n",
> -                  header->index);
> -       continue;
> +         fprintf (dump_file, "    Will duplicate bb %i\n", header->index);
> +
> +       /* Find a successor of header that is inside a loop; i.e. the new
> +          header after the condition is copied.  */
> +       if (flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, EDGE_SUCC (header, 0)->dest))
> +         header = EDGE_SUCC (header, 0)->dest;
> +       else
> +         header = EDGE_SUCC (header, 1)->dest;
>       }
>  
> -      if (should_duplicate_loop_header_p (header, loop, &remaining_limit, 
> NULL))
> -     candidates.safe_push ({loop, static_exit});
> +      if (nheaders)
> +     candidates.safe_push ({loop, nheaders, invariant_exits, static_exits});
> +      else
> +     {
> +       delete invariant_exits;
> +       delete static_exits;
> +     }
>      }
>    /* Do not use ranger after we change the IL and not have updated SSA.  */
>    delete ranger;
> @@ -638,37 +697,25 @@ ch_base::copy_headers (function *fun)
>    for (auto candidate : candidates)
>      {
>        class loop *loop = candidate.loop;
> -      int initial_limit = param_max_loop_header_insns;
> -      int remaining_limit = initial_limit;
>        if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>       fprintf (dump_file,
>                "Copying headers of loop %i\n", loop->num);
>  
> -      header = loop->header;
> -
> -      /* Iterate the header copying up to limit; this takes care of the cases
> -      like while (a && b) {...}, where we want to have both of the conditions
> -      copied.  TODO -- handle while (a || b) - like cases, by not requiring
> -      the header to have just a single successor and copying up to
> -      postdominator.  */
> -
> -      nonexit = NULL;
> -      n_bbs = 0;
> +      basic_block header = loop->header;
> +      edge nonexit = NULL;
> +      edge exit = NULL;
> +      unsigned int n_bbs = 0;
>        int nexits = 0;
>        profile_count exit_count = profile_count::zero ();
>        profile_count entry_count = profile_count::zero ();
>        edge e;
>        edge_iterator ei;
> -      hash_set <edge> invariant_exits;
> +
>        FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, loop->header->preds)
>       if (e->src != loop->latch)
>         entry_count += e->count ();
> -      while (should_duplicate_loop_header_p (header, loop, &remaining_limit,
> -                                          &invariant_exits))
> +      while (n_bbs < candidate.nheaders)
>       {
> -       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> -         fprintf (dump_file, "    Will duplicate bb %i\n", header->index);
> -
>         /* Find a successor of header that is inside a loop; i.e. the new
>            header after the condition is copied.  */
>         if (flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, EDGE_SUCC (header, 0)->dest))
> @@ -688,21 +735,10 @@ ch_base::copy_headers (function *fun)
>         header = nonexit->dest;
>       }
>  
> -      if (!nonexit)
> -     continue;
> -
>        if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> -     {
> -       fprintf (dump_file,
> -                "Duplicating header of the loop %d up to edge %d->%d,"
> -                " %i insns.\n",
> -                loop->num, exit->src->index, exit->dest->index,
> -                initial_limit - remaining_limit);
> -       if (candidate.static_exit)
> -         fprintf (dump_file,
> -                  "  Will eliminate peeled conditional in bb %d.\n",
> -                  candidate.static_exit->src->index);
> -     }
> +     fprintf (dump_file,
> +              "Duplicating header of the loop %d up to edge %d->%d\n",
> +              loop->num, exit->src->index, exit->dest->index);
>  
>        /* Ensure that the header will have just the latch as a predecessor
>        inside the loop.  */
> @@ -712,20 +748,25 @@ ch_base::copy_headers (function *fun)
>         exit = single_pred_edge (header);
>       }
>  
> -      entry = loop_preheader_edge (loop);
> +      edge entry = loop_preheader_edge (loop);
>  
>        propagate_threaded_block_debug_into (exit->dest, entry->dest);
>        if (!gimple_duplicate_seme_region (entry, exit, bbs, n_bbs, copied_bbs,
>                                        true))
>       {
> +       delete candidate.static_exits;
> +       delete candidate.invariant_exits;
>         if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>           fprintf (dump_file, "Duplication failed.\n");
>         continue;
>       }
>        if (loop->header->count.initialized_p ())
>       update_profile_after_ch (loop, bbs, copied_bbs, n_bbs,
> -                              candidate.static_exit, &invariant_exits,
> +                              candidate.invariant_exits,
> +                              candidate.static_exits,
>                                entry_count);
> +      delete candidate.static_exits;
> +      delete candidate.invariant_exits;
>        copied.safe_push (std::make_pair (entry, loop));
>  
>        /* If the loop has the form "for (i = j; i < j + 10; i++)" then
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman;
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to