+Manolis Tsamis On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 23:56, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > On 8/1/23 13:14, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > > > > I have some numbers for f-m-o v3 vs this. Attached here (vs. inline to > > avoid the Thunderbird mangling the test formatting) > Thanks. Of particular importance is the leela change. My recollection > was that the f-m-o work also picked up that case. But if my memory is > faulty (always a possibility), then that shows a clear case where > Jivan's work picks up a case not handled by Manolis's work.
f-m-o originally targeted (and benefited) the leela-case. I wonder if other optimizations/changes over the last year interfere with this and what needs to be changed to accomodate this... looks like we need to revisit against trunk. Philipp. > And on the other direction we can see that deepsjeng isn't helped by > Jivan's work, but is helped by Manolis's new pass. > > I'd always hoped/expected we'd have cases where one patch clearly helped > over the other. While the .25% to .37% improvements for the three most > impacted benchmarks doesn't move the needle much across the whole suite > they do add up over time. > > Jeff
