On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:20 PM Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 12:59:28PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-08-02 at 12:20 -0400, Eric Feng wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eric, thanks for the updated patch.
> >
> > Overall, looks good to me, although I'd drop the "Exited." from the
> > "sorry" message (and thus from the dg-message directive), since the
> > compiler is not exiting, it's just the particular plugin that's giving
> > up (but let's not hold up the patch with a "bikeshed" discussion on the
> > precise wording).
> >
> > If Joseph or Marek approves the C parts of the patch, this will be OK
> > to push to trunk.
>
Sounds good. Revised.
>
> > > index cf82b0306d1..617111b0f0a 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/c/c-parser.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.cc
> > > @@ -1695,6 +1695,32 @@ public:
> > >      return NULL_TREE;
> > >    }
> > >
> > > +  tree
> > > +  lookup_type_by_id (tree id) const final override
> > > +  {
> > > +    if (tree type_decl = lookup_name (id))
> > > +      {
> > > +       if (TREE_CODE (type_decl) == TYPE_DECL)
> > > +         {
> > > +           tree record_type = TREE_TYPE (type_decl);
> > > +           if (TREE_CODE (record_type) == RECORD_TYPE)
> > > +             return record_type;
> > > +         }
> > > +      }
>
> I'd drop this set of { }, like below.  OK with that adjusted, thanks.
Sounds good — fixed.
>
> > > +
> > > +    return NULL_TREE;
> > > +  }
> > > +
> > > +  tree
> > > +  lookup_global_var_by_id (tree id) const final override
> > > +  {
> > > +    if (tree var_decl = lookup_name (id))
> > > +      if (TREE_CODE (var_decl) == VAR_DECL)
> > > +       return var_decl;
> > > +
> > > +    return NULL_TREE;
> > > +  }
> > > +
> > >  private:
> > >    /* Attempt to get an INTEGER_CST from MACRO.
> > >       Only handle the simplest cases: where MACRO's definition is a
>
> Marek
>

Thank you, everyone. I've submitted a new patch with the described
changes. As I do not yet have write access, could someone please help
me commit it? Otherwise, please let me know if I should request write
access first (the GettingStarted page suggested requesting someone
commit the patch for the first few patches before requesting write
access).

Best,
Eric

Reply via email to