On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 6:39 AM Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 21:20, Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches <
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > This adds a simple match pattern for this case.
> > I noticed it a couple of different places.
> > One while I was looking at code generation of a parser and
> > also while I was looking at locations where bitwise_inverted_equal_p
> > should be used more.
> >
> > Committed as approved after bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu
> > with no regressions.
> >
> >         PR tree-optimization/110937
> >         PR tree-optimization/100798
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * match.pd (`a ? ~b : b`): Handle this
> >         case.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-14.c: New test.
> >         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-15.c: New test.
> >         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-33.c: New test.
> >         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c: Update testcase
> >         so `a ? -1 : 0` is not used to hit the match
> >         pattern.
> >
>
> Our CI noticed that your patch introduced regressions as follows on aarch64:
>
>  Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/aarch64.exp ...
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/cond_op_imm_1.c scan-assembler csinv\tw[0-9]*.*
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/cond_op_imm_1.c scan-assembler csinv\tx[0-9]*.*
>
> Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sve/aarch64-sve.exp ...
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_5.c scan-assembler-not \\tmov\\tz
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_5.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tneg\\tz[0-9]+\\.b, p[0-7]/m, 3
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_5.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tneg\\tz[0-9]+\\.h, p[0-7]/m, 2
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_5.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tneg\\tz[0-9]+\\.s, p[0-7]/m, 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_5.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tnot\\tz[0-9]+\\.b, p[0-7]/m, 3
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_5.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tnot\\tz[0-9]+\\.h, p[0-7]/m, 2
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_5.c scan-assembler-times
> \\tnot\\tz[0-9]+\\.s, p[0-7]/m, 1
>
> Hopefully you'll just need to update the testcases (I didn't check
> manually, I think you can easily reproduce this on aarch64?)

I have a few ideas of how to fix this properly inside isel without
changing the testcases. I will start working on that starting
tomorrow.
In the meantime can you file a bug report? So we don't lose track of
the regression?

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe
>
>
>
>
> > ---
> >  gcc/match.pd                               | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c |  5 +++--
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-14.c    | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-15.c    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-33.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-14.c
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-15.c
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-33.c
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> > index 9b4819e5be7..fc630b63563 100644
> > --- a/gcc/match.pd
> > +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> > @@ -6460,6 +6460,20 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> >        (if (cmp == NE_EXPR)
> >         { constant_boolean_node (true, type); })))))))
> >
> > +#if GIMPLE
> > +/* a?~t:t -> (-(a))^t */
> > +(simplify
> > + (cond @0 @1 @2)
> > + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> > +      && bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@1, @2))
> > +  (with {
> > +    auto prec = TYPE_PRECISION (type);
> > +    auto unsign = TYPE_UNSIGNED (type);
> > +    tree inttype = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, unsign);
> > +   }
> > +   (convert (bit_xor (negate (convert:inttype @0)) (convert:inttype
> > @2))))))
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /* Simplify pointer equality compares using PTA.  */
> >  (for neeq (ne eq)
> >   (simplify
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c
> > index 5009cd69cfe..78938f919d4 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c
> > @@ -29,15 +29,16 @@ union tree_node
> >  };
> >  int make_decl_rtl (tree, int);
> >  void *
> > -get_alias_set (t)
> > +get_alias_set (t, t1)
> >       tree t;
> > +     void *t1;
> >  {
> >    long set;
> >    if (t->decl.rtl)
> >      return (t->decl.rtl->fld[1].rtmem
> >             ? 0
> >             : (((t->decl.rtl ? t->decl.rtl: (make_decl_rtl (t, 0),
> > t->decl.rtl)))->fld[1]).rtmem);
> > -  return (void*)-1;
> > +  return t1;
> >  }
> >
> >  /* There should be precisely one load of ->decl.rtl.  If there is
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-14.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-14.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..0149380a63b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-14.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized-raw" } */
> > +/* PR tree-optimization/110937 */
> > +
> > +_Bool f2(_Bool a, _Bool b)
> > +{
> > +        if (a)
> > +          return !b;
> > +        return b;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* We should be able to remove the conditional and convert it to an xor.
> > */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "gimple_cond " "optimized" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "gimple_phi " "optimized" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "bit_xor_expr, " 1 "optimized" } } */
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-15.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-15.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..1f496663863
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-15.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized-raw" } */
> > +/* PR tree-optimization/110937 */
> > +
> > +_Bool f2(int x, int y, int w, int z)
> > +{
> > +  _Bool a = x == y;
> > +  _Bool b = w == z;
> > +  if (a)
> > +    return !b;
> > +  return b;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* We should be able to remove the conditional and convert it to an xor.
> > */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "gimple_cond " "optimized" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "gimple_phi " "optimized" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "ne_expr, " "optimized" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "bit_xor_expr, " 1 "optimized" } } */
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-33.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-33.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..b79fe44187a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-33.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized-raw" } */
> > +/* PR tree-optimization/100798 */
> > +
> > +int f(int a, int t)
> > +{
> > +  return (a=='s' ? ~t : t);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* This should be convert into t^-(a=='s').  */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "bit_xor_expr, " 1 "optimized" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "negate_expr, " 1 "optimized" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "bit_not_expr, " "optimized" } } */
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
> >

Reply via email to