> > Hi Jin Ma, > > > > On 5/16/23 00:06, jinma via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > On 5/15/23 07:16, Jin Ma wrote: > > >> > > >> Do we also need to check Z[FDH]INX too? > > >> > > >> Otherwise it looks pretty good. We just need to wait for everything to > > >> freeze and finalization on the assembler interface. > > >> > > >> jeff > > > Yes, you are right, we also need to check Z[FDH]INX. I will send a patch > > > again to fix it after others give some review comments. > > > > Can we please revisit this and get this merged upstream. > > Seems like gcc is supporting frozen but not ratified extensions. > > > > Thx, > > -Vineet > > OK, I will check and resend a patch about this in a few days. > > Thanks, > Jin
Done, and please review again. Compared with the v9 version two months ago, the previous review comments have been modified. At the same time, the variable riscv_zfa_subext have been added to riscv.opt to enable zfa extension.
