on 2023/8/15 17:13, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> writes: >>> OK, fair enough. So the idea is: see where we end up and then try to >>> improve/factor the APIs in a less peephole way? >> >> Yeah, I think that's the only good way forward. > > OK, no objection from me. Sorry for holding the patch up.
This hasn't been approved yet (although the patch on VMAT_LOAD_STORE_LANES was), so it wasn't held up and thanks for sharing your thoughts and making it get attention. :) >From the discussions, it seems this looks good to both of you. But I could be wrong, so may I ask if it's ok for trunk? BR, Kewen
