Committed, thanks Richard.

Pan

-----Original Message-----
From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-bounces+pan2.li=intel....@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf 
Of Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 4:36 PM
To: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Add xfail for riscv_vector

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:

> Like ARM SVE, when we enable scalable vectorization for RVV,
> we can't do constant fold for these yet for both ARM SVE and RVV.
> 
> 
> Ok for trunk ?

OK.

> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-1.c: Add riscv_vector.
>       * gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-2.c: Ditto.
>       * gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-3.c: Ditto.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-1.c | 2 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-2.c | 2 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-3.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-1.c
> index e25c6c04543..ddcebb067ea 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-1.c
> @@ -51,4 +51,4 @@ main ()
>  
>  /* ??? We need more constant folding for this to work with fully-masked
>     loops.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {REDUC_PLUS} "optimized" { xfail 
> aarch64_sve } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {REDUC_PLUS} "optimized" { xfail { 
> aarch64_sve || riscv_vector } } } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-2.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-2.c
> index f4c41bd8e58..ef5ea8a1a86 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-2.c
> @@ -51,4 +51,4 @@ main ()
>  
>  /* ??? We need more constant folding for this to work with fully-masked
>     loops.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {REDUC_PLUS} "optimized" { xfail 
> aarch64_sve } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {REDUC_PLUS} "optimized" { xfail { 
> aarch64_sve || riscv_vector } } } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-3.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-3.c
> index 0fc23bf0ee7..75b8d024a95 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-3.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-3.c
> @@ -51,4 +51,4 @@ main ()
>  
>  /* ??? We need more constant folding for this to work with fully-masked
>     loops.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {REDUC_PLUS} "optimized" { xfail 
> aarch64_sve } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {REDUC_PLUS} "optimized" { xfail { 
> aarch64_sve || riscv_vector } } } } */
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to