Ping?
Teresa

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohn...@google.com> wrote:
>
> On David's suggestion, I have removed the changes that rename niter_desc
> to
> loop_desc from this patch to focus the patch on the unrolling changes. I
> can
> submit a cleanup patch to do the renaming as soon as this one goes in.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.  Ok for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Teresa
>
> Here is the new description of improvements from the original patch:
>
> Improved patch based on feedback. Main changes are:
>
> 1) Improve efficiency by caching loop analysis results in the loop
> auxiliary
> info structure hanging off the loop structure. Added a new routine,
> analyze_loop_insns, to fill in information about the average and total
> number
> of branches, as well as whether there are any floating point set and call
> instructions in the loop. The new routine is invoked when we first create
> a
> loop's niter_desc struct, and the caller (get_simple_loop_desc) has been
> modified to handle creating a niter_desc for the fake outermost loop.
>
> 2) Improvements to max_unroll_with_branches:
> - Treat the fake outermost loop (the procedure body) as we would a hot
> outer
> loop, i.e. compute the max unroll looking at its nested branches, instead
> of
> shutting off unrolling when we reach the fake outermost loop.
> - Pull the checks previously done in the caller into the routine (e.g.
> whether the loop iterates frequently or contains fp instructions).
> - Fix a bug in the previous version that sometimes caused overflow in the
> new unroll factor.
>
> 3) Remove float variables, and use integer computation to compute the
> average number of branches in the loop.
>
> 4) Detect more types of floating point computations in the loop by walking
> all set instructions, not just single sets.
>
> 2012-05-04   Teresa Johnson  <tejohn...@google.com>
>
>        * doc/invoke.texi: Update the documentation with new params.
>        * loop-unroll.c (max_unroll_with_branches): New function.
>        (decide_unroll_constant_iterations,
> decide_unroll_runtime_iterations):
>        Add heuristic to avoid increasing branch mispredicts when
> unrolling.
>        (decide_peel_simple, decide_unroll_stupid): Retrieve number of
>        branches from niter_desc instead of via function that walks loop.
>        * loop-iv.c (get_simple_loop_desc): Invoke new analyze_loop_insns
>        function, and add guards to enable this function to work for the
>        outermost loop.
>        * cfgloop.c (insn_has_fp_set, analyze_loop_insns): New functions.
>        (num_loop_branches): Remove.
>        * cfgloop.h (struct loop_desc): Added new fields to cache
> additional
>        loop analysis information.
>        (num_loop_branches): Remove.
>        (analyze_loop_insns): Declare.
>        * params.def (PARAM_MIN_ITER_UNROLL_WITH_BRANCHES): New param.
>        (PARAM_UNROLL_OUTER_LOOP_BRANCH_BUDGET): Ditto.
>
> Index: doc/invoke.texi
> ===================================================================
> --- doc/invoke.texi     (revision 187013)
> +++ doc/invoke.texi     (working copy)
> @@ -8842,6 +8842,12 @@ The maximum number of insns of an unswitched loop.
>  @item max-unswitch-level
>  The maximum number of branches unswitched in a single loop.
>
> +@item min-iter-unroll-with-branches
> +Minimum iteration count to ignore branch effects when unrolling.
> +
> +@item unroll-outer-loop-branch-budget
> +Maximum number of branches allowed in hot outer loop region after unroll.
> +
>  @item lim-expensive
>  The minimum cost of an expensive expression in the loop invariant motion.
>
> Index: loop-unroll.c
> ===================================================================
> --- loop-unroll.c       (revision 187013)
> +++ loop-unroll.c       (working copy)
> @@ -152,6 +152,99 @@ static void combine_var_copies_in_loop_exit (struc
>                                             basic_block);
>  static rtx get_expansion (struct var_to_expand *);
>
> +/* Compute the maximum number of times LOOP can be unrolled without
> exceeding
> +   a branch budget, which can increase branch mispredictions. The number
> of
> +   branches is computed by weighting each branch with its expected
> execution
> +   probability through the loop based on profile data. If no profile
> feedback
> +   data exists, simply return the current NUNROLL factor.  */
> +
> +static unsigned
> +max_unroll_with_branches(struct loop *loop, unsigned nunroll)
> +{
> +  struct loop *outer;
> +  struct niter_desc *outer_desc = 0;
> +  int outer_niters = 1;
> +  int frequent_iteration_threshold;
> +  unsigned branch_budget;
> +  struct niter_desc *desc = get_simple_loop_desc (loop);
> +
> +  /* Ignore loops with FP computation as these tend to benefit much more
> +     consistently from unrolling.  */
> +  if (desc->has_fp)
> +    return nunroll;
> +
> +  frequent_iteration_threshold = PARAM_VALUE
> (PARAM_MIN_ITER_UNROLL_WITH_BRANCHES);
> +  if (expected_loop_iterations (loop) >= (unsigned)
> frequent_iteration_threshold)
> +    return nunroll;
> +
> +  /* If there was no profile feedback data, av_num_branches will be 0
> +     and we won't limit unrolling. If the av_num_branches is at most 1,
> +     also don't limit unrolling as the back-edge branch will not be
> duplicated.  */
> +  if (desc->av_num_branches <= 1)
> +    return nunroll;
> +
> +  /* Walk up the loop tree until we find a hot outer loop in which the
> current
> +     loop is nested. At that point we will compute the number of times
> the
> +     current loop can be unrolled based on the number of branches in the
> hot
> +     outer loop.  */
> +  outer = loop_outer (loop);
> +  /* The loop structure contains a fake outermost loop, so this should
> always
> +     be non-NULL for our current loop.  */
> +  gcc_assert (outer);
> +
> +  /* Walk up the loop tree until we either find a hot outer loop or hit
> the
> +     fake outermost loop at the root.  */
> +  while (true)
> +    {
> +      outer_desc = get_simple_loop_desc (outer);
> +
> +      /* Stop if we hit the fake outermost loop at the root of the tree,
> +         which includes the whole procedure.  */
> +      if (!loop_outer (outer))
> +        break;
> +
> +      if (outer_desc->const_iter)
> +        outer_niters *= outer_desc->niter;
> +      else if (outer->header->count)
> +        outer_niters *= expected_loop_iterations (outer);
> +
> +      /* If the outer loop has enough iterations to be considered hot,
> then
> +         we can stop our upwards loop tree traversal and examine the
> current
> +         outer loop.  */
> +      if (outer_niters >= frequent_iteration_threshold)
> +        break;
> +
> +      outer = loop_outer (outer);
> +    }
> +
> +  gcc_assert(outer);
> +
> +  /* Assume that any call will cause the branch budget to be exceeded,
> +     and that we can't unroll the current loop without increasing
> +     mispredicts.  */
> +  if (outer_desc->has_call)
> +    return 0;
> +
> +  /* Otherwise, compute the maximum number of times current loop can be
> +     unrolled without exceeding our branch budget. First we subtract
> +     off the outer loop's average branch count from the budget. Note
> +     that this includes the branches in the current loop. This yields
> +     the number of branches left in the budget for the unrolled copies.
> +     We divide this by the number of branches in the current loop that
> +     must be duplicated when we unroll, which is the total average
> +     number of branches minus the back-edge branch. This yields the
> +     number of new loop body copies that can be created by unrolling
> +     without exceeding the budget, to which we add 1 to get the unroll
> +     factor. Note that the "outermost loop" may be the whole procedure
> +     if we did not find a hot enough enclosing loop.  */
> +  branch_budget = PARAM_VALUE (PARAM_UNROLL_OUTER_LOOP_BRANCH_BUDGET);
> +  if (outer_desc->av_num_branches > branch_budget)
> +    return 0;
> +  /* We already returned early if desc->av_num_branches <= 1.  */
> +  return (branch_budget - outer_desc->av_num_branches)
> +      / (desc->av_num_branches - 1) + 1;
> +}
> +
>  /* Unroll and/or peel (depending on FLAGS) LOOPS.  */
>  void
>  unroll_and_peel_loops (int flags)
> @@ -522,6 +615,7 @@ static void
>  decide_unroll_constant_iterations (struct loop *loop, int flags)
>  {
>   unsigned nunroll, nunroll_by_av, best_copies, best_unroll = 0, n_copies,
> i;
> +  unsigned nunroll_branches;
>   struct niter_desc *desc;
>
>   if (!(flags & UAP_UNROLL))
> @@ -565,6 +659,21 @@ decide_unroll_constant_iterations (struct loop *lo
>       return;
>     }
>
> +  /* Be careful when unrolling loops with branches inside -- it can
> increase
> +     the number of mispredicts.  */
> +  if (desc->num_branches > 1)
> +    {
> +      nunroll_branches = max_unroll_with_branches (loop, nunroll);
> +      if (nunroll > nunroll_branches)
> +        nunroll = nunroll_branches;
> +      if (nunroll <= 1)
> +        {
> +          if (dump_file)
> +           fprintf (dump_file, ";; Not unrolling, contains branches\n");
> +          return;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
>   /* Check whether the loop rolls enough to consider.  */
>   if (desc->niter < 2 * nunroll)
>     {
> @@ -802,7 +911,7 @@ unroll_loop_constant_iterations (struct loop *loop
>  static void
>  decide_unroll_runtime_iterations (struct loop *loop, int flags)
>  {
> -  unsigned nunroll, nunroll_by_av, i;
> +  unsigned nunroll, nunroll_by_av, nunroll_branches, i;
>   struct niter_desc *desc;
>
>   if (!(flags & UAP_UNROLL))
> @@ -856,6 +965,21 @@ decide_unroll_runtime_iterations (struct loop *loo
>       return;
>     }
>
> +  /* Be careful when unrolling loops with branches inside -- it can
> increase
> +     the number of mispredicts.  */
> +  if (desc->num_branches > 1)
> +    {
> +      nunroll_branches = max_unroll_with_branches (loop, nunroll);
> +      if (nunroll > nunroll_branches)
> +        nunroll = nunroll_branches;
> +      if (nunroll <= 1)
> +        {
> +          if (dump_file)
> +            fprintf (dump_file, ";; Not unrolling, contains branches\n");
> +          return;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
>   /* If we have profile feedback, check whether the loop rolls.  */
>   if ((loop->header->count
>        && expected_loop_iterations (loop) < 2 * nunroll)
> @@ -1233,7 +1357,7 @@ decide_peel_simple (struct loop *loop, int flags)
>
>   /* Do not simply peel loops with branches inside -- it increases number
>      of mispredicts.  */
> -  if (num_loop_branches (loop) > 1)
> +  if (desc->num_branches > 1)
>     {
>       if (dump_file)
>        fprintf (dump_file, ";; Not peeling, contains branches\n");
> @@ -1394,7 +1518,7 @@ decide_unroll_stupid (struct loop *loop, int flags
>
>   /* Do not unroll loops with branches inside -- it increases number
>      of mispredicts.  */
> -  if (num_loop_branches (loop) > 1)
> +  if (desc->num_branches > 1)
>     {
>       if (dump_file)
>        fprintf (dump_file, ";; Not unrolling, contains branches\n");
> Index: loop-iv.c
> ===================================================================
> --- loop-iv.c   (revision 187013)
> +++ loop-iv.c   (working copy)
> @@ -2948,8 +2948,12 @@ get_simple_loop_desc (struct loop *loop)
>   /* At least desc->infinite is not always initialized by
>      find_simple_loop_exit.  */
>   desc = XCNEW (struct niter_desc);
> -  iv_analysis_loop_init (loop);
> -  find_simple_exit (loop, desc);
> +  if (loop->latch != EXIT_BLOCK_PTR)
> +    {
> +      iv_analysis_loop_init (loop);
> +      find_simple_exit (loop, desc);
> +    }
> +  analyze_loop_insns (loop, desc);
>   loop->aux = desc;
>
>   if (desc->simple_p && (desc->assumptions || desc->infinite))
> Index: cfgloop.c
> ===================================================================
> --- cfgloop.c   (revision 187013)
> +++ cfgloop.c   (working copy)
> @@ -1156,24 +1156,98 @@ get_loop_exit_edges (const struct loop *loop)
>   return edges;
>  }
>
> -/* Counts the number of conditional branches inside LOOP.  */
> +/* Determine if INSN is a floating point set.  */
>
> -unsigned
> -num_loop_branches (const struct loop *loop)
> +static bool
> +insn_has_fp_set(rtx insn)
>  {
> -  unsigned i, n;
> -  basic_block * body;
> +  int i;
> +  rtx pat = PATTERN(insn);
> +  if (GET_CODE (pat) == SET)
> +    return (FLOAT_MODE_P (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (pat))));
> +  else if (GET_CODE (pat) == PARALLEL)
> +    {
> +      for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (pat, 0); i++)
> +        {
> +          rtx sub = XVECEXP (pat, 0, i);
> +          if (GET_CODE (sub) == SET)
> +            return (FLOAT_MODE_P (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub))));
> +        }
> +    }
> +  return false;
> +}
>
> -  gcc_assert (loop->latch != EXIT_BLOCK_PTR);
> +/* Analyzes the instructions inside LOOP, updating the DESC. Currently
> counts
> +   the number of conditional branch instructions, calls and fp
> instructions,
> +   as well as the average number of branches executed per iteration.  */
>
> +void
> +analyze_loop_insns (const struct loop *loop, struct niter_desc *desc)
> +{
> +  unsigned i, nbranch;
> +  gcov_type weighted_nbranch;
> +  bool has_call, has_fp;
> +  basic_block * body, bb;
> +  rtx insn;
> +  gcov_type header_count = loop->header->count;
> +
> +  nbranch = weighted_nbranch = 0;
> +  has_call = has_fp = false;
> +
>   body = get_loop_body (loop);
> -  n = 0;
>   for (i = 0; i < loop->num_nodes; i++)
> -    if (EDGE_COUNT (body[i]->succs) >= 2)
> -      n++;
> +    {
> +      bb = body[i];
> +
> +      if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->succs) >= 2)
> +        {
> +          nbranch++;
> +
> +          /* If this block is executed less frequently than the header
> (loop
> +             entry), then it is weighted based on its execution count,
> which
> +             will be turned into a ratio compared to the loop header
> below. */
> +          if (bb->count < header_count)
> +            weighted_nbranch += bb->count;
> +
> +          /* When it is executed more frequently than the header (i.e. it
> is
> +             in a nested inner loop), simply weight the branch the same
> as the
> +             header execution count, so that it will contribute 1 branch
> to
> +             the ratio computed below. */
> +          else
> +            weighted_nbranch += header_count;
> +        }
> +
> +      /* No need to iterate through the instructions below if
> +         both flags have already been set.  */
> +      if (has_call && has_fp)
> +        continue;
> +
> +      FOR_BB_INSNS (bb, insn)
> +        {
> +          if (!INSN_P (insn))
> +            continue;
> +
> +          if (!has_call)
> +            has_call = CALL_P (insn);
> +
> +          if (!has_fp)
> +            has_fp = insn_has_fp_set (insn);
> +        }
> +    }
>   free (body);
>
> -  return n;
> +  desc->num_branches = nbranch;
> +  /* Now divide the weights computed above by the loop header execution
> count,
> +     to compute the average number of branches through the loop. By
> adding
> +     header_count/2 to the numerator we round to nearest with integer
> +     division.  */
> +  if (header_count  != 0)
> +    desc->av_num_branches
> +        = (weighted_nbranch + header_count/2) / header_count;
> +  else
> +    desc->av_num_branches = 0;
> +  desc->has_call = has_call;
> +  desc->has_fp = has_fp;
>  }
>
>  /* Adds basic block BB to LOOP.  */
> Index: cfgloop.h
> ===================================================================
> --- cfgloop.h   (revision 187013)
> +++ cfgloop.h   (working copy)
> @@ -249,7 +249,6 @@ extern basic_block *get_loop_body_in_custom_order
>
>  extern VEC (edge, heap) *get_loop_exit_edges (const struct loop *);
>  edge single_exit (const struct loop *);
> -extern unsigned num_loop_branches (const struct loop *);
>
>  extern edge loop_preheader_edge (const struct loop *);
>  extern edge loop_latch_edge (const struct loop *);
> @@ -359,7 +358,8 @@ struct rtx_iv
>  };
>
>  /* The description of an exit from the loop and of the number of
> iterations
> -   till we take the exit.  */
> +   till we take the exit. Also includes other information used primarily
> +   by the loop unroller.  */
>
>  struct niter_desc
>  {
> @@ -400,6 +400,18 @@ struct niter_desc
>
>   /* The number of iterations of the loop.  */
>   rtx niter_expr;
> +
> +  /* The number of branches in the loop.  */
> +  unsigned num_branches;
> +
> +  /* The number of executed branches per iteration.  */
> +  unsigned av_num_branches;
> +
> +  /* Whether the loop contains a call instruction.  */
> +  bool has_call;
> +
> +  /* Whether the loop contains fp instructions.  */
> +  bool has_fp;
>  };
>
>  extern void iv_analysis_loop_init (struct loop *);
> @@ -413,6 +425,7 @@ extern void iv_analysis_done (void);
>
>  extern struct niter_desc *get_simple_loop_desc (struct loop *loop);
>  extern void free_simple_loop_desc (struct loop *loop);
> +void analyze_loop_insns (const struct loop *, struct niter_desc *desc);
>
>  static inline struct niter_desc *
>  simple_loop_desc (struct loop *loop)
> Index: params.def
> ===================================================================
> --- params.def  (revision 187013)
> +++ params.def  (working copy)
> @@ -312,6 +312,15 @@ DEFPARAM(PARAM_MAX_UNROLL_ITERATIONS,
>         "The maximum depth of a loop nest we completely peel",
>         8, 0, 0)
>
> +DEFPARAM(PARAM_MIN_ITER_UNROLL_WITH_BRANCHES,
> +       "min-iter-unroll-with-branches",
> +       "Minimum iteration count to ignore branch effects when unrolling",
> +       50, 0, 0)
> +DEFPARAM(PARAM_UNROLL_OUTER_LOOP_BRANCH_BUDGET,
> +       "unroll-outer-loop-branch-budget",
> +       "Maximum number of branches allowed in hot outer loop region after
> unroll",
> +       25, 0, 0)
> +
>  /* The maximum number of insns of an unswitched loop.  */
>  DEFPARAM(PARAM_MAX_UNSWITCH_INSNS,
>        "max-unswitch-insns",
>
> --
> This patch is available for review at
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6099055




--
Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohn...@google.com | 408-460-2413

Reply via email to