Lehua Ding <lehua.d...@rivai.ai> writes:
> V3 change: Address Richard's comments.
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds support that tries to fold `MIN (poly, poly)` to
> a constant. Consider the following C Code:
>
> ```
> void foo2 (int* restrict a, int* restrict b, int n)
> {
>     for (int i = 0; i < 3; i += 1)
>       a[i] += b[i];
> }
> ```
>
> Before this patch:
>
> ```
> void foo2 (int * restrict a, int * restrict b, int n)
> {
>   vector([4,4]) int vect__7.27;
>   vector([4,4]) int vect__6.26;
>   vector([4,4]) int vect__4.23;
>   unsigned long _32;
>
>   <bb 2> [local count: 268435456]:
>   _32 = MIN_EXPR <3, POLY_INT_CST [4, 4]>;
>   vect__4.23_20 = .MASK_LEN_LOAD (a_11(D), 32B, { -1, ... }, _32, 0);
>   vect__6.26_15 = .MASK_LEN_LOAD (b_12(D), 32B, { -1, ... }, _32, 0);
>   vect__7.27_9 = vect__6.26_15 + vect__4.23_20;
>   .MASK_LEN_STORE (a_11(D), 32B, { -1, ... }, _32, 0, vect__7.27_9); [tail 
> call]
>   return;
>
> }
> ```
>
> After this patch:
>
> ```
> void foo2 (int * restrict a, int * restrict b, int n)
> {
>   vector([4,4]) int vect__7.27;
>   vector([4,4]) int vect__6.26;
>   vector([4,4]) int vect__4.23;
>
>   <bb 2> [local count: 268435456]:
>   vect__4.23_20 = .MASK_LEN_LOAD (a_11(D), 32B, { -1, ... }, 3, 0);
>   vect__6.26_15 = .MASK_LEN_LOAD (b_12(D), 32B, { -1, ... }, 3, 0);
>   vect__7.27_9 = vect__6.26_15 + vect__4.23_20;
>   .MASK_LEN_STORE (a_11(D), 32B, { -1, ... }, 3, 0, vect__7.27_9); [tail call]
>   return;
>
> }
> ```
>
> For RISC-V RVV, csrr and branch instructions can be reduced:
>
> Before this patch:
>
> ```
> foo2:
>         csrr    a4,vlenb
>         srli    a4,a4,2
>         li      a5,3
>         bleu    a5,a4,.L5
>         mv      a5,a4
> .L5:
>         vsetvli zero,a5,e32,m1,ta,ma
>         ...
> ```
>
> After this patch.
>
> ```
> foo2:
>       vsetivli        zero,3,e32,m1,ta,ma
>         ...
> ```
>
> Best,
> Lehua
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>       * fold-const.cc (can_min_p): New function.
>       (poly_int_binop): Try fold MIN_EXPR.

OK, thanks.

Richard

> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c: Adjust.
>       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c: Adjust.
>       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/fold-min-poly.c: New test.
>
> ---
>  gcc/fold-const.cc                             | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../riscv/rvv/autovec/fold-min-poly.c         | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c  |  2 +-
>  .../riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c           |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/fold-min-poly.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> index 1da498a3152..d19b4666c65 100644
> --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> @@ -1213,6 +1213,25 @@ wide_int_binop (wide_int &res,
>    return true;
>  }
>  
> +/* Returns true if we know who is smaller or equal, ARG1 or ARG2, and set the
> +   min value to RES.  */
> +bool
> +can_min_p (const_tree arg1, const_tree arg2, poly_wide_int &res)
> +{
> +  if (known_le (wi::to_poly_widest (arg1), wi::to_poly_widest (arg2)))
> +    {
> +      res = wi::to_poly_wide (arg1);
> +      return true;
> +    }
> +  else if (known_le (wi::to_poly_widest (arg2), wi::to_poly_widest (arg1)))
> +    {
> +      res = wi::to_poly_wide (arg2);
> +      return true;
> +    }
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
>  /* Combine two poly int's ARG1 and ARG2 under operation CODE to
>     produce a new constant in RES.  Return FALSE if we don't know how
>     to evaluate CODE at compile-time.  */
> @@ -1261,6 +1280,11 @@ poly_int_binop (poly_wide_int &res, enum tree_code 
> code,
>       return false;
>        break;
>  
> +    case MIN_EXPR:
> +      if (!can_min_p (arg1, arg2, res))
> +     return false;
> +      break;
> +
>      default:
>        return false;
>      }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/fold-min-poly.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/fold-min-poly.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..de4c472c76e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/fold-min-poly.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options " -march=rv64gcv_zvl128b -mabi=lp64d -O3 --param 
> riscv-autovec-preference=scalable --param riscv-autovec-lmul=m1 
> -fno-vect-cost-model" } */
> +
> +void foo1 (int* restrict a, int* restrict b, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < 4; i += 1)
> +      a[i] += b[i];
> +}
> +
> +void foo2 (int* restrict a, int* restrict b, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < 3; i += 1)
> +      a[i] += b[i];
> +}
> +
> +void foo3 (int* restrict a, int* restrict b, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < 5; i += 1)
> +      a[i] += b[i];
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tcsrr\t} } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tvsetivli\tzero,4,e32,m1,t[au],m[au]} } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tvsetivli\tzero,3,e32,m1,t[au],m[au]} } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c
> index f3388a86e38..40224c69458 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c
> @@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ DEF_OP_VV (div, 512, int64_t, /)
>  
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times 
> {vdivu?\.vv\s+v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+} 42 } } */
>  /* TODO: Ideally, we should make sure there is no "csrr vlenb". However, we 
> still have 'csrr vlenb' for some cases since we don't support VLS mode 
> conversion which are needed by division.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {csrr} 19 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {csrr} } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c
> index 98822b15657..b34a349949b 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c
> @@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ DEF_OP_VV (shift, 512, int64_t, <<)
>  
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times 
> {vsll\.vv\s+v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+} 41 } } */
>  /* TODO: Ideally, we should make sure there is no "csrr vlenb". However, we 
> still have 'csrr vlenb' for some cases since we don't support VLS mode 
> conversion which are needed by division.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {csrr} 18 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {csrr} } } */

Reply via email to