Ping.
> > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
> > > wrote:
> > > > In the former fix in commit 41ef5a34161356817807be3a2e51fbdbe575ae85 I
> > > > completely missed the fact that the normal form of a generated constant
> > > > for a
> > > > mode with fewer bits than in HOST_WIDE_INT is a sign extended version
> > > > of the
> > > > actual constant. This even holds true for unsigned constants.
> > > >
> > > > Fixed by masking out the upper bits for the incoming constant and sign
> > > > extending the resulting unsigned constant.
> > > >
> > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x64 and s390x. Ok for mainline?
> > > >
> > > > While reading existing optimizations in combine I stumbled across two
> > > > optimizations where either my intuition about the representation of
> > > > unsigned integers via a const_int rtx is wrong, which then in turn would
> > > > probably also mean that this patch is wrong, or that the optimizations
> > > > are missed sometimes. In other words in the following I would assume
> > > > that the upper bits are masked out:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/combine.cc b/gcc/combine.cc
> > > > index 468b7fde911..80c4ff0fbaf 100644
> > > > --- a/gcc/combine.cc
> > > > +++ b/gcc/combine.cc
> > > > @@ -11923,7 +11923,7 @@ simplify_compare_const (enum rtx_code code,
> > > > machine_mode mode,
> > > > /* (unsigned) < 0x80000000 is equivalent to >= 0. */
> > > > else if (is_a <scalar_int_mode> (mode, &int_mode)
> > > > && GET_MODE_PRECISION (int_mode) - 1 <
> > > > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
> > > > - && ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op
> > > > + && (((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op & GET_MODE_MASK
> > > > (int_mode))
> > > > == HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << (GET_MODE_PRECISION
> > > > (int_mode) - 1)))
> > > > {
> > > > const_op = 0;
> > > > @@ -11962,7 +11962,7 @@ simplify_compare_const (enum rtx_code code,
> > > > machine_mode mode,
> > > > /* (unsigned) >= 0x80000000 is equivalent to < 0. */
> > > > else if (is_a <scalar_int_mode> (mode, &int_mode)
> > > > && GET_MODE_PRECISION (int_mode) - 1 <
> > > > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
> > > > - && ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op
> > > > + && (((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op & GET_MODE_MASK
> > > > (int_mode))
> > > > == HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << (GET_MODE_PRECISION
> > > > (int_mode) - 1)))
> > > > {
> > > > const_op = 0;
> > > >
> > > > For example, while bootstrapping on x64 the optimization is missed since
> > > > a LTU comparison in QImode is done and the constant equals
> > > > 0xffffffffffffff80.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for inlining another patch, but I would really like to make sure
> > > > that my understanding is correct, now, before I come up with another
> > > > patch. Thus it would be great if someone could shed some light on this.
> > > >
> > > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > > >
> > > > * combine.cc (simplify_compare_const): Properly handle unsigned
> > > > constants while narrowing comparison of memory and constants.
> > > > ---
> > > > gcc/combine.cc | 19 ++++++++++---------
> > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/combine.cc b/gcc/combine.cc
> > > > index e46d202d0a7..468b7fde911 100644
> > > > --- a/gcc/combine.cc
> > > > +++ b/gcc/combine.cc
> > > > @@ -12003,14 +12003,15 @@ simplify_compare_const (enum rtx_code code,
> > > > machine_mode mode,
> > > > && !MEM_VOLATILE_P (op0)
> > > > /* The optimization makes only sense for constants which are big
> > > > enough
> > > > so that we have a chance to chop off something at all. */
> > > > - && (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op > 0xff
> > > > - /* Bail out, if the constant does not fit into INT_MODE. */
> > > > - && (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op
> > > > - < ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << (GET_MODE_PRECISION (int_mode) - 1) <<
> > > > 1) - 1)
> > > > + && ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op & GET_MODE_MASK
> > > > (int_mode)) > 0xff
> > > > /* Ensure that we do not overflow during normalization. */
> > > > - && (code != GTU || (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op <
> > > > HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U))
> > > > + && (code != GTU
> > > > + || ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op & GET_MODE_MASK
> > > > (int_mode))
> > > > + < HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U)
> > > > + && trunc_int_for_mode (const_op, int_mode) == const_op)
> > > > {
> > > > - unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT n = (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op;
> > > > + unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT n
> > > > + = (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op & GET_MODE_MASK (int_mode);
> > > > enum rtx_code adjusted_code;
> > > >
> > > > /* Normalize code to either LEU or GEU. */
> > > > @@ -12051,15 +12052,15 @@ simplify_compare_const (enum rtx_code code,
> > > > machine_mode mode,
> > > > HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX ") to (MEM %s "
> > > > HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX ").\n", GET_MODE_NAME
> > > > (int_mode),
> > > > GET_MODE_NAME (narrow_mode_iter), GET_RTX_NAME (code),
> > > > - (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT)const_op, GET_RTX_NAME
> > > > (adjusted_code),
> > > > - n);
> > > > + (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) const_op & GET_MODE_MASK
> > > > (int_mode),
> > > > + GET_RTX_NAME (adjusted_code), n);
> > > > }
> > > > poly_int64 offset = (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN
> > > > ? 0
> > > > : (GET_MODE_SIZE (int_mode)
> > > > - GET_MODE_SIZE (narrow_mode_iter)));
> > > > *pop0 = adjust_address_nv (op0, narrow_mode_iter, offset);
> > > > - *pop1 = GEN_INT (n);
> > > > + *pop1 = gen_int_mode (n, narrow_mode_iter);
> > > > return adjusted_code;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > --
> > > > 2.41.0
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
> > School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
