I don't think it can fix the case when it is -march=rv64gc_zve32x
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-09-15 00:17
To: Juzhe-Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] RISC-V: Expand VLS mode to scalar mode move[PR111391]
I am thinking what we are doing is something like we are allowing
scalar mode within the vector register, so...not sure should we try to
implement that within the mov pattern?
I guess we need some inputs from Jeff.
e.g.
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 0ecda795b38..ffced41588d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -7621,6 +7621,9 @@ riscv_hard_regno_mode_ok (unsigned int regno,
machine_mode mode)
}
else if (V_REG_P (regno))
{
+ if (mode is scalar)
+ return true;
+
if (!riscv_v_ext_mode_p (mode))
return false;
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
index 6d6a2b3748c..50bac39f125 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
@@ -2035,8 +2035,8 @@ (define_insn "*movdi_32bit"
(set_attr "ext" "base,base,base,base,d,d,d,d,d,vector")])
(define_insn "*movdi_64bit"
- [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r,r,r, m,
*f,*f,*r,*f,*m,r")
- (match_operand:DI 1 "move_operand" "
r,T,m,rJ,*r*J,*m,*f,*f,*f,vp"))]
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r,r,r, m,
*f,*f,*r,*f,*m,r,*vr,*r,*vr,*vr,*m")
+ (match_operand:DI 1 "move_operand" "
r,T,m,rJ,*r*J,*m,*f,*f,*f,vp,vr,vr,r,m,vr"))]
"TARGET_64BIT
&& (register_operand (operands[0], DImode)
|| reg_or_0_operand (operands[1], DImode))"
