On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:23 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Richard Sandiford > <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Ping for this patch to always supply a mode to plus_constant: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg00892.html >> >> I've done a diff of the changes since the original test revision >> (which was r186448 FWIW) and there's only been one plus_constant- >> related change since then: Alan's rs6000 prologue/epilogue fixes. >> I'd repeat the original testing before committing. >> > > This caused: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
It also casuses IA64 build to fail for me: /gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c: In function 'ia64_emit_probe_stack_range': /gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c:3279: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'plus_constant' /gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c:3279: warning: passing argument 2 of 'plus_constant' makes pointer from integer without a cast /gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c:3279: error: too few arguments to function 'plus_constant' /gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c:3330: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'plus_constant' ... Richard. > > -- > H.J.
