Committed - Thanks!
Patrick
On 9/15/23 13:06, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:37:48 PDT (-0700), Patrick O'Neill wrote:
On 9/15/23 01:49, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote:
I guess another solution is using reg_or_subregno instead of REGNO, but
that should not catch more cases, and just more run-time check, so this
version is LGTM.
I tested an equivalent patch (without the comment changes).
This patch resolves the build errors on glibc rv64gc with
--enable-checking=rtl.
Tested for regressions (without --enable-checking=rtl) using rv64gc &
rv32gc glibc.
This patch does not cause any regressions on those targets.
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com>T
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com>
Thanks!
Patrick
