On 05/14/2012 06:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/14/2012 09:22 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
In terms of implementation details: the new _loc variant (I'm also
finding useful a build_min_loc and a build_min_non_dep_loc, by the way)
seems identical to the non-_loc variant besides calling
SET_EXPR_LOCATION, thus I'm thinking: would it make sense to have the
current non-_loc variants implemented in terms of the new ones and
That's problematic with variadic functions.
Yeah. I'm trying to replace *all* the current ones with the _loc
variant. The patch as you can imagine is becoming *huge*. Some details
will probably need another pass.
Paolo.