Sorry for I made a mistake here.

Change 'mayb_lt' into '!ordered_p' in V2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/630835.html 





juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
 
From: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: 2023-09-19 10:25
To: gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc; Juzhe-Zhong
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix RVV can change mode class bug
After support the VLS mode conversion, current case triggers a latent bug that 
we are
lucky we didn't encounter.
 
This is a real bug in 'cprop_hardreg':
 
orig:RVVMF8BI,16,16
new:V32BI,32,0
during RTL pass: cprop_hardreg
auto.c: In function 'main':
auto.c:79:1: internal compiler error: in partial_subreg_p, at rtl.h:3186
   79 | }
      | ^
0x10979a7 partial_subreg_p(machine_mode, machine_mode)
        ../../../../gcc/gcc/rtl.h:3186
0x1723eda mode_change_ok
        ../../../../gcc/gcc/regcprop.cc:402
0x1724007 maybe_mode_change
        ../../../../gcc/gcc/regcprop.cc:436
0x172445d find_oldest_value_reg
        ../../../../gcc/gcc/regcprop.cc:489
0x172534d copyprop_hardreg_forward_1
        ../../../../gcc/gcc/regcprop.cc:808
0x1727017 cprop_hardreg_bb
        ../../../../gcc/gcc/regcprop.cc:1358
0x17272f7 execute
        ../../../../gcc/gcc/regcprop.cc:1425
 
When trying to do reg copy propagation between RVVMF8BI (precision = 16,16)
and V32BI (precision = 32,0).
 
The assertion failed in partial_subreg_p:
gcc_checking_assert (ordered_p (outer_prec, inner_prec));
 
In regcprop.cc:
 
  if (partial_subreg_p (orig_mode, new_mode))
    return false;
 
If orig_mode (RVVMF8BI) smaller than new_mode (V32BI), we don't do the hard reg 
propogation.
However, the 'partial_subreg_p' cause ICE since gcc_checking_assert (ordered_p 
(outer_prec, inner_prec)).
 
After analysis in aarch64.cc, they do careful block in 
'TARGET_CAN_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS'.
So it's reasonable block regcprop when old mode size maybe_lt than new mode 
size since we won't do the
copy propgation.
 
gcc/ChangeLog:
 
* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_can_change_mode_class): Fix RVV mode change bug.
 
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 8c766e2e2be..28b45a87351 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -8536,8 +8536,22 @@ riscv_slow_unaligned_access (machine_mode, unsigned int)
/* Implement TARGET_CAN_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS.  */
static bool
-riscv_can_change_mode_class (machine_mode, machine_mode, reg_class_t rclass)
+riscv_can_change_mode_class (machine_mode from, machine_mode to, reg_class_t 
rclass)
{
+  /* We have RVV VLS modes and VLA modes sharing same REG_CLASS.
+     In 'cprop_hardreg' stage, we will try to do hard reg copy propagation
+     between wider mode (FROM) and narrow mode (TO).
+
+     E.g. We should not allow copy propagation
+ - RVVMF8BI (precision = [16, 16]) -> V32BI (precision = [32, 0])
+     since such propagation cause ICE and execution FAIL.
+
+     However, we could allow copy propagation
+ - RVVMF4 (precision = [32, 32]) -> V32BI (precision = [32, 0])
+     since RVVMF4 always >= RV32BI.  */
+  if (reg_classes_intersect_p (V_REGS, rclass)
+      && maybe_lt (GET_MODE_PRECISION (from), GET_MODE_PRECISION (to)))
+    return false;
   return !reg_classes_intersect_p (FP_REGS, rclass);
}
-- 
2.36.3
 

Reply via email to