Hi Andre, Yes indeed - it's fine for trunk and, I would suggest, 13-branch.
Cheers Paul On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 11:01, Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > thanks for the quick review. I've added a testcase with a module and a > finalizer in the derived type. This also is no problem. > > Regtests ok on x86_64_linux_gnu/f37. Ok for trunk? > > Regards, > Andre > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 19:21:12 +0100 > Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Andre, > > > > The patch looks fine to me. Since you mention it in the comment, is it > > worth declaring the derived type 'foo' in a module and giving it a > > final routine? > > > > Thanks for the patch. > > > > Paul > > > > On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 13:45, Andre Vehreschild via Fortran > > <fort...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > attached patch fixes a crash in coarray programs when an allocatable > > > derived > > > typed coarray was freed explicitly. The generated cleanup code did not > > > take > > > into account, that the coarray may have been deallocated already. The > > > patch > > > fixes this by moving the statements accessing components inside the > > > derived > > > type into the block guard by its allocated check. > > > > > > Regtested ok on f37/x86_64. Ok for master? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Andre > > > -- > > > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de > > > -- > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
