On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 18:38, Patrick O'Neill <patr...@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Joern,
>
> I'm seeing new failures introduced by this patch
> (9464e72bcc9123b619215af8cfef491772a3ebd9).
>
> On rv64gcv:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr90263.c scan-assembler memcpy
My testing didn't flag this because I used elf targets. The
expected behaviour now is to use vector instructions for rvv.
so we shouldn't expect memcpy to appear there. I think the
rvv case is suitably covered by the new tests, so we just
have to avoid the failure here. Does the attached patch work for you?
> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_count.f90 execution,
> -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
There seems to be an issue with my test setup regarding fortran, I'll
have to investigate.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr90263.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr90263.c
index 3222a5331c1..09e0446f45c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr90263.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr90263.c
@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ int *f (int *p, int *q, long n)
}
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "mempcpy" { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
} */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "memcpy" { target { ! { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "memcpy" { target { ! { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-*
riscv_v } } } } } */
