Hi, Richi and Robin.

Turns out COND(_LEN)?_ADD can't work.

Is this patch Ok ? Or do you have another solution to change the dump check for 
RVV?

Thanks.



juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
 
From: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: 2023-10-08 09:33
To: gcc-patches
CC: rguenther; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc; Juzhe-Zhong
Subject: [PATCH V2] TEST: Fix vect_cond_arith_* dump checks for RVV
This patch fixes the following dumple FAILs:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_SUB"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
vect " = \\.COND_ADD"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_SUB"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c scan-tree-dump vect " = \\.COND_ADD"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_ADD"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_MUL"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_RDIV"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_SUB"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_ADD"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_MUL"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_RDIV"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_SUB"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_ADD"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_MUL"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_RDIV"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_SUB"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_ADD"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_MUL"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_RDIV"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = \\.COND_SUB"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  
scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = \\.COND_ADD" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  
scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = \\.COND_MUL" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  
scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = \\.COND_RDIV" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  
scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = \\.COND_SUB" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = 
\\.COND_ADD" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = 
\\.COND_MUL" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = 
\\.COND_RDIV" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " = 
\\.COND_SUB" 1
 
For RVV, the expected dumple IR is COND_LEN_* pattern.
 
Also, we are still failing at this check:
 
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized " = 
\\.COND_LEN_SUB"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
optimized " = \\.COND_LEN_SUB"
 
Since we have a known bug in GIMPLE_FOLD that Robin is working on it.
 
@Robin: Plz make sure vect-cond-arith-2.c passes with this patch and your bug 
fix patch.
 
Ok for trunk ?
 
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
 
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c: Fix dump check for RVV.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c: Ditto.
 
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c | 4 ++--
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c | 8 ++++----
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c | 8 ++++----
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c
index 38994ea82a5..3832a660023 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-2.c
@@ -41,5 +41,5 @@ neg_xi (double *x)
   return res_3;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_ADD} "vect" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_fully_masked } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_SUB} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_fully_masked } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?ADD} "vect" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_fully_masked } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?SUB} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_fully_masked } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c
index 1af0fe642a0..5bb75206a68 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-4.c
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ main (void)
   return 0;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_ADD} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_SUB} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_MUL} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_RDIV} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?ADD} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?SUB} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?MUL} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?RDIV} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {VEC_COND_EXPR} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c
index ec3d9db4202..8a168081197 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-5.c
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ main (void)
   return 0;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_ADD} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_SUB} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_MUL} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_RDIV} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?ADD} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?SUB} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?MUL} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?RDIV} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {VEC_COND_EXPR} "optimized" { target { 
vect_double_cond_arith && vect_masked_store } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c
index 2aeebd44f83..c3257890735 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-arith-6.c
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ main (void)
}
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {vectorizing stmts using SLP} 4 "vect" { 
target vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times { = \.COND_ADD} 1 "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times { = \.COND_SUB} 1 "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times { = \.COND_MUL} 1 "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times { = \.COND_RDIV} 1 "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?ADD} 1 "optimized" { 
target vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?SUB} 1 "optimized" { 
target vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?MUL} 1 "optimized" { 
target vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times { = \.COND_L?E?N?_?RDIV} 1 "optimized" { 
target vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {VEC_COND_EXPR} "optimized" { target 
vect_double_cond_arith } } } */
-- 
2.36.3
 

Reply via email to