Oh, my bad seem like that was in later patch, let me fix now 钟居哲 <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> 於 2023年10月11日 週三 15:49 寫道：
> ../../../../gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc:8142:18: error: > ‘TARGET_MIN_VLEN_OPTS’ was not declared in this scope > int min_vlen = TARGET_MIN_VLEN_OPTS (opts); > > > > ------------------------------ > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai > > > *From:* Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@gmail.com> > *Date:* 2023-10-12 05:20 > *To:* Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> > *CC:* Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@sifive.com>; gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; palmer <pal...@dabbelt.com>; rdapp > <rd...@ventanamicro.com>; juzhe.zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> > *Subject:* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] options: Define TARGET_<NAME>_P and > TARGET_<NAME>_OPTS_P macro for Mask and InverseMask > Thanks, committed, and just did one more check with x86 again, it > works as well, hope no more awk portable issue this time :P > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:51 AM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/9/23 22:13, Kito Cheng wrote: > > > We TARGET_<NAME>_P marcro to test a Mask and InverseMask with user > > > specified target_variable, however we may want to test with specific > > > gcc_options variable rather than target_variable. > > > > > > Like RISC-V has defined lots of Mask with TargetVariable, which is not > > > easy to use, because that means we need to known which Mask are > associate with > > > which TargetVariable, so take a gcc_options variable is a better > interface > > > for such use case. > > > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * doc/options.texi (Mask): Document TARGET_<NAME>_P and > > > TARGET_<NAME>_OPTS_P. > > > (InverseMask): Ditto. > > > * opth-gen.awk (Mask): Generate TARGET_<NAME>_P and > > > TARGET_<NAME>_OPTS_P macro. > > > (InverseMask): Ditto. > > OK assuming it passes a build cycle on x86 or some other common target. > > > > jeff > > >
