On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote: > Like comment said, this test failed on 64 bytes vector. > Both RVV and GCN has 64 bytes vector. > > So it's more reasonable to use vect512.
OK > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c: Use vect512. > > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c > index e7573a14933..2dd3d8ee90c 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c > @@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ void foo () > > /* We want to have the store group split into 4, 2, 4 when using 32byte > vectors. > Unfortunately it does not work when 64-byte vectors are available. */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail amdgcn-*-* > } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail vect512 } } > } */ > -- Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)