Hi, On Wed, 16 May 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > Because it accepts any type as tree argument? It's of course not less > > type safety than using macros, but less type safety compared to not > > using templates. > > The overload works if the only types are tree and const_tree. In the > future, we may wish to refine the types so that, for example, we can > have a pointer to a decl and ask if it is a var decl. Cross the bridge when you reach it, not before. Not everybody agrees that the splitting of tree would be a good idea. Right now templates aren't necessary, so you shouldn't use them. (well, and an investigation why they come up with smaller .text would be in order anyway). Ciao, Michael.
