Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, pushed to
trunk as obvious.

-- >8 --

After r14-4796-g3e3d73ed5e85e7, tsubst_copy_and_build (now named
tsubst_expr) no longer dispatches to tsubst for type trees, and
callers have to do it themselves if appropriate.  This patch makes
some overlooked adjustments to Objective-C++-specific code paths.

        PR objc++/111920

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * pt.cc (tsubst_expr) <case AT_ENCODE_EXPR>: Use tsubst instead
        of tsubst_expr.

gcc/objcp/ChangeLog:

        * objcp-lang.cc (objcp_tsubst_expr) <case CLASS_REFERENCE_EXPR>:
        Use tsubst instead of tsubst_expr for type operands.
---
 gcc/cp/pt.cc            |  2 +-
 gcc/objcp/objcp-lang.cc | 10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 210c6cb9e4d..1c1c9313118 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -20261,7 +20261,7 @@ tsubst_expr (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t 
complain, tree in_decl)
        op1 = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
        ++cp_unevaluated_operand;
        ++c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
-       op1 = tsubst_expr (op1, args, complain, in_decl);
+       op1 = tsubst (op1, args, complain, in_decl);
        --cp_unevaluated_operand;
        --c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
        RETURN (objc_build_encode_expr (op1));
diff --git a/gcc/objcp/objcp-lang.cc b/gcc/objcp/objcp-lang.cc
index 5b04cd66290..ee39aece848 100644
--- a/gcc/objcp/objcp-lang.cc
+++ b/gcc/objcp/objcp-lang.cc
@@ -66,8 +66,14 @@ objcp_tsubst_expr (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t 
complain, tree in_decl)
         RECURSE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 2)), NULL);
 
     case CLASS_REFERENCE_EXPR:
-      return objc_get_class_reference
-       (RECURSE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0)));
+      {
+       tree ident = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
+       if (TYPE_P (ident))
+         ident = tsubst (ident, args, complain, in_decl);
+       else
+         ident = RECURSE (ident);
+       return objc_get_class_reference (ident);
+      }
 
     default:
       break;
-- 
2.42.0.424.gceadf0f3cf

Reply via email to