Ping?

Le lun. 2 oct. 2023, 10:24, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> a
écrit :

> ping?
>
> On Sun, 10 Sept 2023 at 21:31, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Some targets like arm-eabi with newlib and default settings rely on
>> __sync_synchronize() to ensure synchronization.  Newlib does not
>> implement it by default, to make users aware they have to take special
>> care.
>>
>> This makes a few tests fail to link.
>>
>> This patch adds a new thread_fence effective target (similar to the
>> corresponding one in libstdc++ testsuite), and uses it in the tests
>> that need it, making them UNSUPPORTED instead of FAIL and UNRESOLVED.
>>
>> 2023-09-10  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
>>
>>         gcc/
>>         * doc/sourcebuild.texi (Other attributes): Document thread_fence
>>         effective-target.
>>
>>         gcc/testsuite/
>>         * g++.dg/init/array54.C: Require thread_fence.
>>         * gcc.dg/c2x-nullptr-1.c: Likewise.
>>         * gcc.dg/pr103721-2.c: Likewise.
>>         * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_thread_fence):
>>         New.
>> ---
>>  gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi              |  4 ++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array54.C   |  1 +
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c2x-nullptr-1.c  |  1 +
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103721-2.c     |  1 +
>>  gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 12 ++++++++++++
>>  5 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>> index 1a78b3c1abb..a5f61c29f3b 100644
>> --- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>> +++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
>> @@ -2860,6 +2860,10 @@ Compiler has been configured to support link-time
>> optimization (LTO).
>>  Compiler and linker support link-time optimization relocatable linking
>>  with @option{-r} and @option{-flto} options.
>>
>> +@item thread_fence
>> +Target implements @code{__atomic_thread_fence} without relying on
>> +non-implemented @code{__sync_synchronize()}.
>> +
>>  @item naked_functions
>>  Target supports the @code{naked} function attribute.
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array54.C
>> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array54.C
>> index f6be350ba72..5241e451d6d 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array54.C
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array54.C
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>  // PR c++/90947
>>  // { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
>> +// { dg-require-effective-target thread_fence }
>>
>>  #include <atomic>
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c2x-nullptr-1.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c2x-nullptr-1.c
>> index 4e440234d52..97a31c27409 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c2x-nullptr-1.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c2x-nullptr-1.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>  /* Test valid usage of C23 nullptr.  */
>>  /* { dg-do run } */
>> +// { dg-require-effective-target thread_fence }
>>  /* { dg-options "-std=c2x -pedantic-errors -Wall -Wextra
>> -Wno-unused-variable" } */
>>
>>  #include <stdarg.h>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103721-2.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103721-2.c
>> index aefa1f0f147..e059b1cfc2d 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103721-2.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103721-2.c
>> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>>  // { dg-do run }
>> +// { dg-require-effective-target thread_fence }
>>  // { dg-options "-O2" }
>>
>>  extern void abort ();
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>> b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>> index d353cc0aaf0..7ac9e7530cc 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>> @@ -9107,6 +9107,18 @@ proc check_effective_target_sync_char_short { } {
>>              || [check_effective_target_mips_llsc] }}]
>>  }
>>
>> +# Return 1 if thread_fence does not rely on __sync_synchronize
>> +# library function
>> +
>> +proc check_effective_target_thread_fence {} {
>> +    return [check_no_compiler_messages thread_fence executable {
>> +       int main () {
>> +           __atomic_thread_fence (__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>> +           return 0;
>> +       }
>> +    } ""]
>> +}
>> +
>>  # Return 1 if the target uses a ColdFire FPU.
>>
>>  proc check_effective_target_coldfire_fpu { } {
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>

Reply via email to