> Looks reasonable overall.  The new match patterns are 1:1 the
> same as the COND_ ones.  That's a bit awkward, but I don't see
> a good way to "macroize" stuff further there.  Can you at least
> interleave the COND_LEN_* ones with the other ones instead of
> putting them all at the end?

Yes, no problem.  It's supposed to be only temporary anyway (FWIW)
as I didn't manage with the "stripping _LEN" way on the first few tries.
Still on the todo list but unlikely to be done before stage 1 closes.

I believe Richard "kind of" LGTM'ed the rest minus the spurious
pattern (which is gone now) but there is still the direct optab change
that he didn't comment on so I think we should wait for his remarks
still.

Regards
 Robin

Reply via email to