Also, I didn't enable multi-lib.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Robin Dapp Date: 2023-11-13 16:52 To: 钟居哲; gcc-patches; palmer; kito.cheng; Jeff Law CC: rdapp.gcc Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: testsuite: Fix 32-bit FAILs. > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/slp-mask-run-1.c -O3 -ftree-vectorize > (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c -std=c99 -O3 > -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for > excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-runu.c -std=c99 -O3 > -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for > excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c -std=c99 > -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for > excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c -std=c99 -O3 > -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for > excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c -std=c99 -O3 > -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for > excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vmv-imm-run.c -O3 -ftree-vectorize (test > for excess errors) Hmm, I don't see those here locally: PASS: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax execution test PASS: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-runu.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax execution test PASS: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax execution test PASS: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax execution test ... PASS: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vmv-imm-run.c -O3 -ftree-vectorize execution test Could you please post logs for them? Maybe a spike vs qemu thing and/or there is indeed an error in the expander still? Regards Robin
