Hi,

another simple issue, this one remained assigned to me for a while ;) Anyway, we are not rejecting storage classes for anonymous unions in class scope. Details: I'm handling anonymous structs in the same way, for consistency (but in principle being an extension we could do nothing); the error message I choose is quite terse (essentially the beginning of the Standard wording about this issue); in terms of testing, auto is of course special in C++11 (I could also, for example, wrap the lines for the auto case in #ifndef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__)

Bootstrapped and tested x86_64-linux, as usual.

Thanks,
Paolo.

//////////////////////
/cp
2012-05-25  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>

        PR c++/32054
        * parser.c (cp_parser_member_declaration): A storage class is not
        allowed in a declaration of an anonymous union (and struct, as a
        GCC extension) in a class scope.

/testsuite
2012-05-25  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>

        PR c++/32054
        * g++.dg/other/anon-union3.C: New.

Index: testsuite/g++.dg/other/anon-union3.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/other/anon-union3.C        (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/other/anon-union3.C        (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// PR c++/32054
+
+class C
+{
+  auto union      // { dg-error "storage class" "" { target c++98 } }
+    {
+      int a;
+    };            // { dg-error "multiple|specified" "" { target c++11 } }
+  register union  // { dg-error "storage class" }
+    {
+      int b;
+    };
+  static union    // { dg-error "storage class" }
+    {
+      int c;
+    };
+  extern union    // { dg-error "storage class" }
+    {
+      int d;
+    };
+  mutable union   // { dg-error "storage class" }
+    {
+      int e;
+    };
+};
Index: cp/parser.c
===================================================================
--- cp/parser.c (revision 187868)
+++ cp/parser.c (working copy)
@@ -18910,6 +18910,11 @@ cp_parser_member_declaration (cp_parser* parser)
             particular type), as opposed to a nested class.  */
          else if (ANON_AGGR_TYPE_P (type))
            {
+             /* C++11 9.5/6.  */
+             if (decl_specifiers.storage_class != sc_none)
+               error_at (decl_spec_token_start->location,
+                         "a storage class is not allowed");
+
              /* Remove constructors and such from TYPE, now that we
                 know it is an anonymous aggregate.  */
              fixup_anonymous_aggr (type);

Reply via email to