On Wed, 2023-11-29 at 17:33 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On Mon, 2023-11-27 at 23:06 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > This has (of course) been tested on rv64. It's also been bootstrapped > > and regression tested on x86. Bootstrap and regression tested (C only) > > for m68k, sh4, sh4eb, alpha. Earlier versions were also bootstrapped > > and regression tested on ppc, hppa and s390x (C only for those as well). > > It's also been tested on the various crosses in my tester. So we've > > got reasonable coverage of 16, 32 and 64 bit targets, big and little > > endian, with and without SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED and all kinds of other > > oddities. > > > > The included tests are for RISC-V only because not all targets are going > > to have extraneous extensions. There's tests from coremark, x264 and > > GCC's bz database. It probably wouldn't be hard to add aarch64 > > testscases. The BZs listed are improved by this patch for aarch64. > > I've successfully bootstrapped this on loongarch64-linux-gnu and tried > the added test cases. For loongarch64 the redundant extensions are > removed for core_bench_list.c, core_init_matrix.c, core_list_init.c, > matrix_add_const.c, and pr111384.c, but not mem-extend.c.
Follow up: no regression in GCC test suite on LoongArch. > Should I change something in LoongArch backend in order to make ext_dce > work for mem-extend.c too? If yes then any pointers? -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
