HI Sam,

I think this qualifies as obvious (it’s on my list, but I did not get to it yet,
so go ahead).

Iain

> On 2 Dec 2023, at 05:30, Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> From: Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk>
> 
> r12-3005-g220c410162ebece4f missed a cast for the set_32 call.
> Fixed thus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org>
> 
> libiberty/ChangeLog:
>       PR other/112823
>       * simple-object-mach-o.c (simple_object_mach_o_write_segment):
>       Cast the first argument to set_32 as needed.
> 
> (cherry picked from commit 38757aa88735ab2e511bc428e2407a5a5e9fa0be)
> ---
> libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c 
> b/libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c
> index 72b69d19c216..a8869e7c6395 100644
> --- a/libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c
> +++ b/libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c
> @@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ simple_object_mach_o_write_segment (simple_object_write 
> *sobj, int descriptor,
>       /* Swap the indices, if required.  */
> 
>       for (i = 0; i < (nsects_in * 4); ++i)
> -     set_32 (&index[i], index[i]);
> +     set_32 ((unsigned char *) &index[i], index[i]);
> 
>       sechdr_offset += sechdrsize;
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reply via email to