Various approaches are used to optimize extracting a sign extended single bit bitfield. The length computation of 10 bytes was conservatively correct, but inaccurate.

In particular when the bit we want is in the low half word we don't need the move high half to low half instruction. Account for that in the length computation.

This was spotted when looking at regressions in the generalized signed bitfield extraction pattern.

This has been regression tested on the H8 port.

Pushing to the trunk,
Jeff
commit 1f55c5cc698519094f751257db62ff274c015fdc
Author: Jeff Law <j...@ventanamicro.com>
Date:   Sun Dec 10 10:05:18 2023 -0700

    [committed] Fix length computation of single bit bitfield extraction on H8
    
    Various approaches are used to optimize extracting a sign extended single 
bit
    bitfield.  The length computation of 10 bytes was conservatively correct, 
but
    inaccurate.
    
    In particular when the bit we want is in the low half word we don't need the
    move high half to low half instruction.  Account for that in the length
    computation.
    
    This was spotted when looking at regressions in the generalized signed 
bitfield
    extraction pattern.
    
    This has been regression tested on the H8 port.
    
    gcc/
            * config/h8300/combiner.md (single bit signed bitfield extraction): 
Fix
            length computation when the bit we want is in the low half word.

diff --git a/gcc/config/h8300/combiner.md b/gcc/config/h8300/combiner.md
index e1179b5fea6..cce187805c7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/h8300/combiner.md
+++ b/gcc/config/h8300/combiner.md
@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ (define_insn ""
      to get that bit into the destination, properly extended.  */
   return "subx\t%s0,%s0\;exts.w %T0\;exts.l %0";
 }
-  [(set_attr "length" "10")])
+  [(set (attr "length") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[2]) >= 16 ? 10 : 8"))])
 
 ;; For shift counts >= 16 we can always do better than the
 ;; generic sequences.  Other patterns handle smaller counts.

Reply via email to